6 Tennessee opinions name it 3 courts 2012–2025 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Tennessee courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Black v. Blountgreen1 sentence2025“While criminal contempts may arise in the course of private civil litigation, such proceedings, ‘in a very true sense raise an issue between the public and the accused.’” Black v. Blount, 938 S.W.2d 394, 398 (Tenn. 1996) (quoting State v. Daugherty, 191 S.W. 974 , 974 (1917)). | 1 | 1 |
Tracy Rose Baker v. State of Tennesseegreen1 sentence2025“For example, indirect criminal contempt may only be punished after the accused contemnor has been given notice and an opportunity to respond to the allegations at a hearing.” Baker, 417 S.W.3d at 436 (footnote omitted). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Hestergreen2 sentences2024Id. at 77 . - 16 - Because we have rejected each of the Defendant’s above allegations of error related to the trial proceedings, her argument that she is entitled to relief based on the cumulative error doctrine fails. 2024See id. at 76-77 . | 1 | 1 |
State v. Madduxgreen1 sentence2013P. 42(b); Cooke v. United States, 267 U.S. 517, 537 , 45 S.Ct. 390 , 69 L.Ed. 767 (1925); State v. Maddux, 571 S.W.2d 819, 821 (Tenn.1978). | 1 | 1 |
Stein v. Davidson Hotel Co.green1 sentence2012Such a motion admits the truth of all of the relevant and material averments contained in the complaint, Stein v. Davidson Hotel Co., 945 S.W.2d 714, 716 (Tenn. 1997), and challenges the legal sufficiency of the allegations to state a claim for relief. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Tennessee. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Wilkerson
green
1 sentence2013Because, however, the trial court had failed to specifically address underlying factors essential to a dangerous offender classification, as set forth in State v. Wilkerson, 905 S.W.2d 933 (Tenn.1995), the Court of Criminal Appeals remanded that issue to the trial court for reconsideration of whether the sentences should be served consecutively or concurrently. | 1 | 2013–2013 |
Cooke v. United States
green
2 sentences2013P. 42(b); Cooke v. United States, 267 U.S. 517, 537 , 45 S.Ct. 390 , 69 L.Ed. 767 (1925); State v. Maddux, 571 S.W.2d 819, 821 (Tenn.1978). 2013P. 42(b); Cooke v. United States, 267 U.S. 517, 537 , 45 S.Ct. 390 , 69 L.Ed. 767 (1925); State v. Maddux, 571 S.W.2d 819, 821 (Tenn.1978). | 1 | 2013–2013 |
Barker v. Wingo
green
1 sentence2013The Defendant filed a timely notice of appeal. -2- ANALYSIS In this appeal, the Defendant contends that his right to a speedy trial was violated, explaining that “[a] two year, eight month delay in a probation revocation proceeding has warranted dismissal on grounds of a denial of speedy trial.” Although he acknowledges that issues cannot be raised for the first time on appeal, the Defendant asserts that this court should consider his speedy trial argument because “it was pointed out at the revocation hearing by counsel and the trial court.” The State responds that “the [D]efendant has waived | 1 | 2013–2013 |
Basil Marceaux v. Governor Don Sundquist
green
1 sentence2012Marceaux v. Sundquist, 107 S.W.3d 527 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2002). | 1 | 2012–2012 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.