Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Arkansas opinions name it 2 courts 1987–2019 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Arkansas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Threadgill v. Stategreen2 sentences2019Threadgill v. State, 347 Ark. 986, 993 , 69 S.W.3d 423, 428 (2002). 2019Threadgill v. State, 347 Ark. 986, 993 , 69 S.W.3d 423, 428 (2002). | 1 | 1 |
Thompson v. Stategreen1 sentence2016See Stanley v. State, 2013 Ark. 483 (per curiam). 4 Cite as 2016 Ark. 380 A trial court’s decision to deny relief under section 16-90-111 will not be overturned unless that decision is clearly erroneous. | 1 | 1 |
Stanley v. Stategreen1 sentence2016See Stanley v. State, 2013 Ark. 483 (per curiam). 4 Cite as 2016 Ark. 380 A trial court’s decision to deny relief under section 16-90-111 will not be overturned unless that decision is clearly erroneous. | 1 | 1 |
Parker v. Stategreen2 sentences1995See Parker v. State, 292 Ark. 421 , 731 S.W.2d 756 (1987). 1995See Parker v. State, 292 Ark. 421 , 731 S.W.2d 756 (1987). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Arkansas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Brady v. Maryland
green
2 sentences2016Frazier asserts that counsel erred by failing to petition this court for review of the decision rendered by the court of appeals' and also raises a new- allegation that counsel failed to challenge the prosecution, under Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 , 83 S.Ct. 1194 , 10 L.Ed.2d 215 (1963), for withholding evidence that consisted of pretrial statements given to investigators by Sharon Watts. 2016Frazier asserts that counsel erred by failing to petition this court for review of the decision rendered by the court of appeals' and also raises a new- allegation that counsel failed to challenge the prosecution, under Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 , 83 S.Ct. 1194 , 10 L.Ed.2d 215 (1963), for withholding evidence that consisted of pretrial statements given to investigators by Sharon Watts. | 1 | 2016–2016 |
Watts v. State
green
1 sentence2013Additionally, the other allegations of error are not subject to review in a coram- nobis proceeding because these matters were known or could have been known to appellant at -6- Cite as 2013 Ark. 485 the time of trial such that the issue could have been raised at trial. | 1 | 2013–2013 |
Russell v. State
green
2 sentences1987Russell & Davis v. State, 262 Ark. 447 , 559 S.W.2d 7 (1977). 1987Russell & Davis v. State, 262 Ark. 447 , 559 S.W.2d 7 (1977). | 1 | 1987–1987 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.