traffic citation warning (Tennessee) · Go Syfert
← Tennessee issues

traffic citation warning in Tennessee

6 Tennessee opinions name it 2 courts 2000–2012 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Tennessee courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (3)

CaseFollowedCited
State v. McCrarygreen
tenncrimapp · 2000 · cited in 4 Tennessee opinions naming this issue, 2002–2012
2 sentences

2012Our courts have previously held that “[w]hen a police officer issues a traffic citation or warning and returns a driver’s license and registration, a traffic stop ceases to be a seizure ... and becomes a consensual encounter.... ” State v. McCrary, 45 S.W.3d 36, 42 (Tenn.Crim.

2011The State argues that case law supports its assertion that a traffic stop ceases to be a seizure only after the officer issues “a traffic citation or warning and returns a driver’s license and registration.” State v. McCrary, 45 S.W.3d 36, 42 (Tenn. Crim.

44
United States v. Anthony E. Andersongreen
ca10 · 1997 · cited in 2 Tennessee opinions naming this issue, 2000–2000
2 sentences

2000Ashworth, 3 S.W.3d at 29 -30 (citing United States v. Sullivan, 138 F.3d 126, 133 (4th Cir. 1998), and United States v. Anderson, 114 F.3d 1059, 1064 (10th Cir. 1997)).

2000Ashworth, 3 S.W.3d at 29 -30 (citing United States v. Sullivan, 138 F.3d 126, 133 (4th Cir.1998), and United States v. Anderson, 114 F.3d 1059, 1064 (10th Cir.1997)).

22
United States v. Sullivangreen
ca4 · 1998 · cited in 2 Tennessee opinions naming this issue, 2000–2000
2 sentences

2000Ashworth, 3 S.W.3d at 29 -30 (citing United States v. Sullivan, 138 F.3d 126, 133 (4th Cir. 1998), and United States v. Anderson, 114 F.3d 1059, 1064 (10th Cir. 1997)).

2000Ashworth, 3 S.W.3d at 29 -30 (citing United States v. Sullivan, 138 F.3d 126, 133 (4th Cir.1998), and United States v. Anderson, 114 F.3d 1059, 1064 (10th Cir.1997)).

22

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Tennessee. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (1)

CaseCitedYears
State v. Ashworth green
tenncrimapp · 1999
2 sentences

2000Ashworth, 3 S.W.3d at 29 -30 (citing United States v. Sullivan, 138 F.3d 126, 133 (4th Cir. 1998), and United States v. Anderson, 114 F.3d 1059, 1064 (10th Cir. 1997)).

2000Ashworth, 3 S.W.3d at 29 -30 (citing United States v. Sullivan, 138 F.3d 126, 133 (4th Cir.1998), and United States v. Anderson, 114 F.3d 1059, 1064 (10th Cir.1997)).

22000–2000

Statutes the citing opinions construe

TN § Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-7-118 (3)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

TN 6 (2000–2012) IA 6 (2016–2025) FL 3 (2013–2026) NE 2 (2018–2020) IL 2 (1990–2013) MD 2 (2003–2006) OH 2 (2000–2016)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check