Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Texas opinions name it 2 courts 1975–2011 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. | ||
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Gerst v. Oak Cliff Savings and Loan Association
green
2 sentences2011In deciding whether an agency has exceeded its rule- . making powers, the determinative factor is whether the rule's provisions are "in harmony with the general objectives of the Act involved." Gerst, 432 S.W.2d at 706 . 1975Gerst v. Oak Cliff Savings and Loan Association, supra. As will be later discussed in the part of this opinion concerned with the regulation as a valid exercise of the State’s police power, we believe that the challenged regulation is in harmony with the general objectives of the Savings and Loan Act. | 2 | 1975–2011 |
State Board of Insurance v. Deffebach
green
2 sentences1987State Board of Insurance v. Deffebach, 631 S.W.2d 794 (Tex.App.-Austin 1982, writ ref'd n.r.e.). 1987State Board of Insurance v. Deffebach. 631 S.W.2d 794 (Tex. App. - Austin 1982, writ ref'd n.r.e.). | 2 | 1987–1987 |
Texas Bankers Ass'n v. Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now (ACORN)
green
1 sentence2011And "[t]ypically construction of a statute by the administrative agency charged with its enforcement is entitled to serious consideration, so long as the construction is reasonable and does not contradict the plain language of the statute." Tex. Bankers Ass'n v. Ass'n of Cmty. Orgs. for Reform Now (ACORN) , 303 S.W.3d 404 , 408 (Tex. App.-Austin 2010, pet. filed) (quoting Tarrant Appraisal Dist. v. Moore , 845 S.W.2d 820 , 823 (Tex. 1993)). | 1 | 2011–2011 |
Tarrant Appraisal District v. Moore
green
1 sentence2011And "[t]ypically construction of a statute by the administrative agency charged with its enforcement is entitled to serious consideration, so long as the construction is reasonable and does not contradict the plain language of the statute." Tex. Bankers Ass'n v. Ass'n of Cmty. Orgs. for Reform Now (ACORN) , 303 S.W.3d 404 , 408 (Tex. App.-Austin 2010, pet. filed) (quoting Tarrant Appraisal Dist. v. Moore , 845 S.W.2d 820 , 823 (Tex. 1993)). | 1 | 2011–2011 |
Jefco, Inc. v. Lewis
green
1 sentence1979Jefco v. Lewis, 520 S.W.2d 915 (Tex.Civ.App.-Austin 1975, writ ref'd n.r.e.). | 1 | 1979–1979 |