Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Texas opinions name it 2 courts 1978–2015 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Ex Parte Colemangreen2 sentences2011Ex parte Coleman , 599 S.W.2d 305, 306 (Tex. Crim. 1984Id. | 1 | 2 |
Waddington v. Sarausadgreen1 sentence2015See id. at 831 (citation omitted). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Cupp v. Naughten
green
2 sentences1978The court held the test to be “whether the ailing instruction by itself so infected the entire trial that the resulting conviction violates due process.” Cupp v. Naughten, 414 U.S. 141, 147 , 94 S.Ct. 396, 400 , 38 L.Ed.2d 368 (1973). 1978The court held the test to be “whether the ailing instruction by itself so infected the entire trial that the resulting conviction violates due process.” Cupp v. Naughten, 414 U.S. 141, 147 , 94 S.Ct. 396, 400 , 38 L.Ed.2d 368 (1973). | 3 | 1978–2005 |
Henderson v. Kibbe
green
2 sentences1978The court reaffirmed that rule in Henderson v. Kibbe, 431 U.S. 145 , 97 S.Ct. 1730 , 52 L.Ed.2d 203 (1977). 1978The court reaffirmed that rule in Henderson v. Kibbe, 431 U.S. 145 , 97 S.Ct. 1730 , 52 L.Ed.2d 203 (1977). | 2 | 1978–1978 |
Estelle v. McGuire
green
2 sentences2005Appellant argues that even though article 37.07, section 4(a) has been held to be constitutional, the jury misconstrued and misapplied the jury charge in this case because appellant, who was probation-eligible, received a ten-year sentence. [2] When reviewing a challenged jury instruction, A the only question . . . is > whether the ailing instruction by itself so infected the entire trial that the resulting conviction violates due process. = @ Estelle v. McGuire , 502 U.S. 62, 72 , 112 S. Ct. 475, 482 , 116 L. 2005Appellant argues that even though article 37.07, section 4(a) has been held to be constitutional, the jury misconstrued and misapplied the jury charge in this case because appellant, who was probation-eligible, received a ten-year sentence. [2] When reviewing a challenged jury instruction, A the only question . . . is > whether the ailing instruction by itself so infected the entire trial that the resulting conviction violates due process. = @ Estelle v. McGuire , 502 U.S. 62, 72 , 112 S. Ct. 475, 482 , 116 L. | 1 | 2005–2005 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.