Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Texas opinions name it 1 courts 1999–2023 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
AutoNation USA Corp. v. Leroygreen2 sentences2023Griffin of Tex., Inc., 513 S.W.3d 66, 74 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2016, no pet.) (quoting AutoNation USA Corp. v. Leroy, 105 S.W.3d 190, 195 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2003, no pet.)); Davis v. Boyd, No. 05-21-00154-CV, 2022 WL 4354174 , at *4 (Tex. App.—Dallas Sept. 20, 2022, no pet) (mem. op.) (“When the contract contains a broadly written arbitration clause, so long as the allegations touch matters, have a significant relationship with, or are inextricably enmeshed or factually intertwined with the contract, the claim will be arbitrable.”). 2017See AutoNation USA Corp. v. Leroy, 105 S.W.3d 190, 195 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2003, no pet.). –6– The factual allegations made against Athas in appellees’ petition are that Athas misread Trevithick’s MRI and workup, failed to send Trevithick to an orthopedic surgeon or neurosurgeon, failed to send Trevithick to a qualified physician, and failed to devise an appropriate treatment plan and plan of care. | 3 | 3 |
In Re Conseco Finance Servicing Corp.green1 sentence2023Servicing Corp., 19 S.W.3d 562, 570 (Tex. App.—Waco 2000, orig. proceeding) (holding broad provision requiring arbitration of any claims “arising from or relating to” contract encompassed claimant’s statutory and tort claims although these claims were not based on the formation, negotiation, terms, or performance of the contract (internal quotations omitted)); see also SSC Wimberley Operating Co. v. Goodman, 665 S.W.3d 729 , 736 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2023, no pet.) (where arbitration clause stated “all claims, controversies or disputes relating to [the plaintiff’s] application for employment, | 1 | 1 |
Southwinds Express Construction, LLC v. D.H. Griffin of Texas, Inc.green1 sentence2023Griffin of Tex., Inc., 513 S.W.3d 66, 74 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2016, no pet.) (quoting AutoNation USA Corp. v. Leroy, 105 S.W.3d 190, 195 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2003, no pet.)); Davis v. Boyd, No. 05-21-00154-CV, 2022 WL 4354174 , at *4 (Tex. App.—Dallas Sept. 20, 2022, no pet) (mem. op.) (“When the contract contains a broadly written arbitration clause, so long as the allegations touch matters, have a significant relationship with, or are inextricably enmeshed or factually intertwined with the contract, the claim will be arbitrable.”). | 1 | 1 |
United Parcel Service, Inc. v. McFallgreen1 sentence1999See McFall, 940 S.W.2d at 719 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Glassell Producing Company, Inc. v. Jared Resources, Ltd.
green
1 sentence2020See Rodriguez, 586 S.W.3d at 432; Amateur Athletic Union of the U.S., Inc., 499 S.W.3d at 105 ; Glassell Producing Co., 422 S.W.3d at 77 . | 1 | 2020–2020 |
Amateur Athletic Union of the United States, Inc., Paul Campbell, Rod Seaford, and Charles Oliver v. Augustus Bray
green
1 sentence2020See Rodriguez, 586 S.W.3d at 432; Amateur Athletic Union of the U.S., Inc., 499 S.W.3d at 105 ; Glassell Producing Co., 422 S.W.3d at 77 . | 1 | 2020–2020 |