Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Texas opinions name it 3 courts 1919–2026 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
City of Arlington v. State Farm Lloydsgreen2 sentences2015See id. at 167 . 2014See id. at 167 . | 2 | 2 |
BoRain Capital, LLC v. Syed Hashmigreen1 sentence2026Addressing Hogan’s claim that Everett breached the alleged oral contract for the transfer of the 66-acre tract, Everett’s motion recited the elements Hogan bore the burden to satisfy to prevail, which are “(1) a valid contract; (2) the plaintiff performed or tendered performance; (3) the defendant breached the contract; and (4) the plaintiff was damaged as a result of the breach.” Brooks v. Excellence Mortg., Ltd., 486 S.W.3d 29, 36 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2015, pet. denied) (citations and internal quotation marks omitted); see also BoRain Cap., LLC v. Hashmi, 533 S.W.3d 32, 36 (Tex. App.—San A | 1 | 1 |
Meru v. Huertagreen1 sentence2026The citations to the rule that appear in this opinion refer to the version that was in effect at the time this lawsuit was filed. -7- 04-25-00555-CV Texarkana 2006, no pet.) (“If the [no-evidence] motion is not specific in challenging a particular element of a claim or defense, it is insufficient as a matter of law.”); Meru v. Huerta, 136 S.W.3d 383, 387 (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi–Edinburg 2004, no pet.) (“Rule 166a(i) does not authorize conclusory motions or general no-evidence challenges to an opponent’s case.”). | 1 | 1 |
Barry Brooks, Heston C. King, Stefen Douglas Brooks, Johanna Barton, and Jesse Rodriguez Benavides v. Excellence Mortgage, Ltd. LADTD-1, LLC Grothues Financial, Ltd. Grothues Brothers Management I, LLC And Georgetown Mortgage, L.L.C.green1 sentence2026Addressing Hogan’s claim that Everett breached the alleged oral contract for the transfer of the 66-acre tract, Everett’s motion recited the elements Hogan bore the burden to satisfy to prevail, which are “(1) a valid contract; (2) the plaintiff performed or tendered performance; (3) the defendant breached the contract; and (4) the plaintiff was damaged as a result of the breach.” Brooks v. Excellence Mortg., Ltd., 486 S.W.3d 29, 36 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2015, pet. denied) (citations and internal quotation marks omitted); see also BoRain Cap., LLC v. Hashmi, 533 S.W.3d 32, 36 (Tex. App.—San A | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Burger King Corp. v. Rudzewicz
green
1 sentence2015Nonetheless, contrary to the majority's All Citations analysis, the above-mentioned contacts are “contacts with Texas.” See Burger King Corp., 471 U.S. at 476 , 105 S.Ct. 377 S.W.3d 115 Footnotes 1 Other plaintiffs have no connection with Horowitz. 2 See Parker v. Robert Ryan Realtors, Inc., No. 14–10–00325–CV, 2010 WL 4226550 , at *3 (Tex.App.-Houston [14th Dist.] Oct. 26, 2010, no pet.) (mem. op.) (“[B]oth parties can present evidence either proving or disproving the allegations.”) (citing Kelly, 301 S.W.3d at 659 ). 3 Kelly, 301 S.W.3d at 659. 4 Id. 5 Id. 6 Cf. Dawson–Austin, 968 S.W.2d at | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Kelly v. General Interior Construction, Inc.
green
1 sentence2015Nonetheless, contrary to the majority's All Citations analysis, the above-mentioned contacts are “contacts with Texas.” See Burger King Corp., 471 U.S. at 476 , 105 S.Ct. 377 S.W.3d 115 Footnotes 1 Other plaintiffs have no connection with Horowitz. 2 See Parker v. Robert Ryan Realtors, Inc., No. 14–10–00325–CV, 2010 WL 4226550 , at *3 (Tex.App.-Houston [14th Dist.] Oct. 26, 2010, no pet.) (mem. op.) (“[B]oth parties can present evidence either proving or disproving the allegations.”) (citing Kelly, 301 S.W.3d at 659 ). 3 Kelly, 301 S.W.3d at 659. 4 Id. 5 Id. 6 Cf. Dawson–Austin, 968 S.W.2d at | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Alexander v. Choate
neutral
1 sentence2015Nonetheless, contrary to the majority's All Citations analysis, the above-mentioned contacts are “contacts with Texas.” See Burger King Corp., 471 U.S. at 476 , 105 S.Ct. 377 S.W.3d 115 Footnotes 1 Other plaintiffs have no connection with Horowitz. 2 See Parker v. Robert Ryan Realtors, Inc., No. 14–10–00325–CV, 2010 WL 4226550 , at *3 (Tex.App.-Houston [14th Dist.] Oct. 26, 2010, no pet.) (mem. op.) (“[B]oth parties can present evidence either proving or disproving the allegations.”) (citing Kelly, 301 S.W.3d at 659 ). 3 Kelly, 301 S.W.3d at 659. 4 Id. 5 Id. 6 Cf. Dawson–Austin, 968 S.W.2d at | 1 | 2015–2015 |
TIC Energy and Chemical, Inc. v. Kevin Bradford Martin
green
1 sentence2015For example, in its reply brief on appeal, TIC argues that sect' on ::\.Q.Q...L;U"provides an All Citations exception to the general framework of section 406.122 and deems the subcontractor the Not Reported in S.W.3d, 2015 WL 127777 End of Document © 2015 Thomson Reuters. | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Ex Parte Davis
neutral
1 sentence1919There is but one authority in this State known to us which seems to hold contrary to the doctrine of the above citations, same being the Ex parte Davis case, 48 Texas Crim. | 1 | 1919–1919 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.