Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Texas opinions name it 1 courts 1998–2017 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Berg v. Stategreen1 sentence2017State's contention, we address the State's claim first. 15 Berg v. State, 747 S.W.2d 800, 809 (Tex. [**7] MODIFICATION OF INDICTMENT Crim. | 1 | 1 |
In Re CSX Corp.green1 sentence2015A reviewing court “shall reverse or remand the case for further proceedings if substantial rights of the appellant have been prejudiced because the administrative findings, inferences, conclusions, or decisions are ... arbitrary or capricious or characterized by abuse of discretion or clearly unwarranted exercises of discretion.” Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 2001.174(2)(F); Hodge, 2013 WL 4680378 , at *2; see also In re CSX Corp., 124 S.W.3d 149, 152 (Tex.2003) (orig. proceeding) (stating that trial court’s determination of motion to quash subpoena is reviewed for abuse of discretion). | 1 | 1 |
Heidelberg v. Stategreen1 sentence2011See Heidelberg v. State , 144 S.W.3d 535 , 542–43 (Tex. Crim. | 1 | 1 |
Jacobs v. Satterwhitegreen1 sentence2010See Jacobs v. Satterwhite , 65 S.W.3d 653 , 655–56 (Tex. 2001) . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
McBryde v. Curry
green
2 sentences1998Id. at 620 . 1998Id. at 620 . | 2 | 1998–1998 |
Olurebi v. State
green
1 sentence2017Since the res- 13 Ibid. olution of Curry's claim depends on our resolution of the 14 Mays, 967 S.W.2d at 407 . | 1 | 2017–2017 |
Garcia v. State
green
1 sentence2017The court of appeals has determined that this Garcia v. State, 15 S.W.3d 533 , 536-37 n.5 (Tex. Crim. error [*407] harmed Curry, and we did not grant re- App. 2000); see also TEX. | 1 | 2017–2017 |
State v. Mays
green
1 sentence2017Since the res- 13 Ibid. olution of Curry's claim depends on our resolution of the 14 Mays, 967 S.W.2d at 407 . | 1 | 2017–2017 |
Johnson & Higgins of Texas, Inc. v. Kenneco Energy, Inc.
green
1 sentence2010Johnson & Higgins of Tex., Inc. v. Kenneco Energy, Inc. , 962 S.W.2d 507 , 515–16 (Tex. 1998). | 1 | 2010–2010 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.