Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Texas opinions name it 1 courts 2006–2013 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Arthur Andersen & Co. v. Perry Equipment Corp.green2 sentences2013Accordingly, we sustain McKeithan’s fourth issue in part and overrule it in part. 9 evidence of the other factors in rule 1.04, most importantly, without evidence that the fee is reasonable for purposes of shifting the fee to . . . [the defendant], does not prove that the fee was reasonable for purposes of a recovery of attorney's fees from . . . [the defendant]”) (citing Arthur Andersen, 945 S.W.2d at 818–19); Main Place Custom Homes, Inc. v. Honaker, 192 S.W.3d 604, 621 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2006, pet. denied) (stating, in a case involving a bench trial, that “[a] party cannot simply ask to 2013Accordingly, we sustain McKeithan’s fourth issue in part and overrule it in part. 9 evidence of the other factors in rule 1.04, most importantly, without evidence that the fee is reasonable for purposes of shifting the fee to . . . [the defendant], does not prove that the fee was reasonable for purposes of a recovery of attorney's fees from . . . [the defendant]”) (citing Arthur Andersen, 945 S.W.2d at 818–19); Main Place Custom Homes, Inc. v. Honaker, 192 S.W.3d 604, 621 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2006, pet. denied) (stating, in a case involving a bench trial, that “[a] party cannot simply ask to | 3 | 6 |
Main Place Custom Homes, Inc. v. Honakergreen1 sentence2013Accordingly, we sustain McKeithan’s fourth issue in part and overrule it in part. 9 evidence of the other factors in rule 1.04, most importantly, without evidence that the fee is reasonable for purposes of shifting the fee to . . . [the defendant], does not prove that the fee was reasonable for purposes of a recovery of attorney's fees from . . . [the defendant]”) (citing Arthur Andersen, 945 S.W.2d at 818–19); Main Place Custom Homes, Inc. v. Honaker, 192 S.W.3d 604, 621 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2006, pet. denied) (stating, in a case involving a bench trial, that “[a] party cannot simply ask to | 1 | 1 |
Terry v. Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance Co.green1 sentence2013Accordingly, we sustain McKeithan’s fourth issue in part and overrule it in part. 9 evidence of the other factors in rule 1.04, most importantly, without evidence that the fee is reasonable for purposes of shifting the fee to . . . [the defendant], does not prove that the fee was reasonable for purposes of a recovery of attorney's fees from . . . [the defendant]”) (citing Arthur Andersen, 945 S.W.2d at 818–19); Main Place Custom Homes, Inc. v. Honaker, 192 S.W.3d 604, 621 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2006, pet. denied) (stating, in a case involving a bench trial, that “[a] party cannot simply ask to | 1 | 1 |
Dolgencorp of Texas, Inc. v. Lermagreen1 sentence2013Dolgencorp, 288 S.W.3d at 930 (directing appellate court to “remand[] for a new trial after a post-answer default judgment rather than rendering judgment”). 20 VI. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Vingcard A.S. v. Merrimac Hospitality Systems, Inc.
green
2 sentences2006Arthur Andersen , 945 S.W.2d at 818-19 ; VingCard , 59 S.W.3d at 869 . 2006Arthur Andersen, 945 S.W.2d at 818-19 ; VingCard, 59 S.W.3d at 869 . | 2 | 2006–2006 |