Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Texas opinions name it 1 courts 1995–2010 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Wheeler v. Methodist Hospitalgreen2 sentences2010See TEX .R.APP.P. 38.1(i); Wheeler v. Methodist Hosp., 95 S.W.3d 628, 646 (Tex.App.--Houston [1st Dist.] 2002, no pet.). 2010See Tex.R.App.P. 38.1(i); Wheeler v. Methodist Hosp. , 95 S.W.3d 628, 646 (Tex.App.--Houston [1st Dist.] 2002, no pet.). | 2 | 2 |
Hernandez v. Stategreen2 sentences2004See Hernandez v. State, 939 S.W,2d 173 , 180 n- 2 (Tex. Crim. 1998See Hernandez v. State, 939 S.W.2d 173 , 180 n. 2 (Tex.Crim.App.1997) (questioning this court’s review of accomplice witness testimony in the absence of such instruction and citing Boozer v. State, 717 S.W.2d 608, 610 (Tex.Crim.App.1984) (sufficiency of the evidence is to be measured by the charge that was given) (emphasis in original)). | 2 | 2 |
Matter of MRgreen2 sentences1995The Supreme Court of Texas has specifically addressed this issue in In the Matter of M.R., 858 S.W.2d at 365. 1995The Supreme Court of Texas has specifically addressed this issue in In the Matter of M.R., 858 S.W.2d at 365. | 2 | 2 |
Boozer v. Statered1 sentence1998See Hernandez v. State, 939 S.W.2d 173 , 180 n. 2 (Tex.Crim.App.1997) (questioning this court’s review of accomplice witness testimony in the absence of such instruction and citing Boozer v. State, 717 S.W.2d 608, 610 (Tex.Crim.App.1984) (sufficiency of the evidence is to be measured by the charge that was given) (emphasis in original)). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.