likely effect error (Texas) · Go Syfert
← Texas issues

likely effect error in Texas

6 Texas opinions name it 1 courts 2002–2015 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (0)

CaseFollowedCited
No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas.

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (2)

CaseCitedYears
O'NEAL v. McAninch green
scotus · 1995
2 sentences

2003While the Schütz, Morales, Johnson, King, and Kotteakos cases discuss stan dards by which reviewing courts are to measure harm stemming from non-constitutional trial error, we find useful the following language contained in O’Neal v. McAninch, 513 U.S. 432 , 115 S.Ct. 992 , 130 L.Ed.2d 947 (1995): But we consider here the legal rule that governs the special circumstances in which record review leaves the conscientious judge in grave doubt about the likely effect of an error on the jury’s verdict.

2003While the Schütz, Morales, Johnson, King, and Kotteakos cases discuss stan dards by which reviewing courts are to measure harm stemming from non-constitutional trial error, we find useful the following language contained in O’Neal v. McAninch, 513 U.S. 432 , 115 S.Ct. 992 , 130 L.Ed.2d 947 (1995): But we consider here the legal rule that governs the special circumstances in which record review leaves the conscientious judge in grave doubt about the likely effect of an error on the jury’s verdict.

52002–2013
Motilla v. State green
texcrimapp · 2002
1 sentence

2015Motilla v. State, 78 S.W.3d 352 , 359 - 360 (Tex.Cr.App. 2002).

12015–2015

Where else courts name it

OR 26 (2007–2026) NM 13 (2017–2026) WV 6 (1996–2020) TX 6 (2002–2015) MI 4 (1996–2023) CA 2 (1998–2014)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check