Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Texas opinions name it 2 courts 2004–2026 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Richmont Holdings, Inc. v. Superior Recharge Systems, L.L.C.green1 sentence2026The “key factors include the reason for delay in moving to enforce arbitration, the amount of discovery conducted by the movant, and whether the movant sought disposition on the merits.” Richmont Holdings, Inc. v. Superior Recharge Sys., L.L.C., 455 S.W.3d 573, 575 (Tex. 2014) (per curiam) (citing Perry Homes, 258 S.W.3d at 590–93); see also Design Tech Homes of Texas, LLC v. Siemens as Co-Trustees of John Siemens & Vashti Siemens Living Revocable Tr., No. 03-23-00735-CV, 2025 WL 62967 , at *14 (Tex. App.—Austin Jan. 10, 2025, no pet.) (mem. op.) (recognizing same). | 1 | 1 |
Wichita Falls State Hospital v. Taylorgreen1 sentence2013See id. | 1 | 1 |
Posey v. Stategreen1 sentence2004See Posey v. State, 966 S.W.2d 57, 62 (Tex.Crim.App.1998). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
In Re Bruce Terminix Co.
green
2 sentences2007Bruce Terminix Co., 988 S.W.2d at 704 ; Loudermilk, 208 S.W.3d at 704 . 2007Bruce Terminix Co., 988 S.W.2d at 704 ; Loudermilk, 208 S.W.3d at 704 . | 3 | 2006–2007 |
Grand Homes 96, L.P. v. Loudermilk
green
2 sentences2007Bruce Terminix Co., 988 S.W.2d at 704 ; Loudermilk, 208 S.W.3d at 704 . 2007Bruce Terminix Co., 988 S.W.2d at 704 ; Loudermilk, 208 S.W.3d at 704 . | 2 | 2007–2007 |
Perry Homes v. Cull
green
2 sentences2026However, all of the factors are rarely present in a single case, and a court may find waiver based on “a few, or even a single one.” Perry Homes, 258 S.W.3d at 591 . 2026The “key factors include the reason for delay in moving to enforce arbitration, the amount of discovery conducted by the movant, and whether the movant sought disposition on the merits.” Richmont Holdings, Inc. v. Superior Recharge Sys., L.L.C., 455 S.W.3d 573, 575 (Tex. 2014) (per curiam) (citing Perry Homes, 258 S.W.3d at 590–93); see also Design Tech Homes of Texas, LLC v. Siemens as Co-Trustees of John Siemens & Vashti Siemens Living Revocable Tr., No. 03-23-00735-CV, 2025 WL 62967 , at *14 (Tex. App.—Austin Jan. 10, 2025, no pet.) (mem. op.) (recognizing same). | 1 | 2026–2026 |
Southwind Group, Inc. v. Landwehr
green
1 sentence2006Bruce Terminix Co. , 988 S.W.2d at 704 ; Southwind Group, Inc. , 188 S.W.3d at 735 . | 1 | 2006–2006 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.