omission of the requested instruction (Texas) · Go Syfert
← Texas issues

omission of the requested instruction in Texas

6 Texas opinions name it 2 courts 1983–2011 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (2)

CaseFollowedCited
Thomas v. Uzokagreen
texapp · 2009 · cited in 2 Texas opinions naming this issue, 2011–2011
2 sentences

2011See Thomas, 290 SW.3d at 445 ; Conquest Drilling Fluids, Inc. 137 S.W.3d at 308 . ("If the error in the charge relates to a contested issue and the evidence is sharply conflicting, the error will likely require reversal.") The Trust asserts the trial court correctly denied the instructions tendered by SPLR regarding an oral agreement because any oral agreement was invalid due to the statute of frauds.

2011See Thomas, 290 SW.3d at 445 ; Conquest Drilling Fluids, Inc. 137 S.W.3d at 308 . ("If the error in the charge relates to a contested issue and the evidence is sharply conflicting, the error will likely require reversal.") The Trust asserts the trial court correctly denied the instructions tendered by SPLR regarding an oral agreement because any oral agreement was invalid due to the statute of frauds.

22
Mieth v. Ranchquest, Inc.green
texapp · 2005 · cited in 2 Texas opinions naming this issue, 2009–2009
2 sentences

2009Thus, because the requested instruction would not have produced a different outcome, we cannot conclude that Thomas was harmed by the omission of the requested instruction. [3] See Mieth v. Ranchquest, Inc. , 177 S.W.3d 296, 305 (Tex. App. C Houston [1st Dist.] 2005, no pet.) ( A [T]he trial court abused its discretion by refusing to submit an instruction on negligence per se.

2009Thus, because the requested instruction would not have produced a different outcome, we cannot conclude that Thomas was harmed by the omission of the requested instruction. 3 See Mieth v. Ranchquest, Inc., 177 S.W.3d 296, 305 (Tex.App.-Houston [1st Dist.] 2005, no pet.) (“[T]he trial court abused its discretion by refusing to submit an instruction on negligence per se.

22

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (4)

CaseCitedYears
Conquest Drilling Fluids, Inc. v. Tri-Flo International, Inc. green
texapp · 2004
2 sentences

2011See Thomas, 290 SW.3d at 445 ; Conquest Drilling Fluids, Inc. 137 S.W.3d at 308 . ("If the error in the charge relates to a contested issue and the evidence is sharply conflicting, the error will likely require reversal.") The Trust asserts the trial court correctly denied the instructions tendered by SPLR regarding an oral agreement because any oral agreement was invalid due to the statute of frauds.

2011See Thomas, 290 SW.3d at 445 ; Conquest Drilling Fluids, Inc. 137 S.W.3d at 308 . ("If the error in the charge relates to a contested issue and the evidence is sharply conflicting, the error will likely require reversal.") The Trust asserts the trial court correctly denied the instructions tendered by SPLR regarding an oral agreement because any oral agreement was invalid due to the statute of frauds.

22011–2011
Crown Life Insurance Company v. Casteel green
tex · 2000
2 sentences

2009App. P. 44.1(a)(2), and asks us to presume harm under Crown Life Insurance Co. v. Casteel . 22 S.W.3d 378 (Tex. 2000).

2009P. 44.1(a)(2), and asks us to presume harm under Crown Life Insurance Co. v. Casteel. 22 S.W.3d 378 (Tex. 2000).

22009–2009
Almanza v. State green
texcrimapp · 1985
1 sentence

1988Almanza v. State, 686 S.W.2d 157 (Tex.Crim.App.1984).

11988–1988
Guadiano v. Fleishman green
texapp · 1982
1 sentence

1983The majority of the court of appeals reversed the judgment of the trial court, holding that the omission of the requested instruction was reversible error. 636 S.W.2d 785 (Tex.App.1982).

11983–1983

Where else courts name it

CT 7 (1991–2023) TX 6 (1983–2011) OH 2 (1990–1998) MD 2 (1991–2005)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check