part of the reasonableness inquiry (Texas) · Go Syfert
← Texas issues

part of the reasonableness inquiry in Texas

6 Texas opinions name it 1 courts 2002–2008 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (2)

CaseFollowedCited
Wilson v. Arkansasgreen
scotus · 1995 · cited in 5 Texas opinions naming this issue, 2002–2004
2 sentences

2004The United States Supreme Court held in Wilson v. Arkansas , 514 U.S. 927, 934 , 115 S. Ct. 1914, 1918 (1995) that the common law knock and announce rule forms a part of the reasonableness inquiry under the Fourth Amendment.

2004The United States Supreme Court held in Wilson v. Arkansas , 514 U.S. 927, 934 , 115 S. Ct. 1914, 1918 (1995) that the common law knock and announce rule forms a part of the reasonableness inquiry under the Fourth Amendment.

25
Alex Sheshunoff Management Services, L.P. v. Johnsongreen
tex · 2006 · cited in 1 Texas opinions naming this issue, 2008–2008
1 sentence

2008See Sheshunoff, 209 S.W.3d at 651 (“[A]n agreement not to compete, like any other contract, must be supported by consideration.”).

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Where else courts name it

TX 6 (2002–2008) MO 4 (1998–2007) AR 4 (1999–2002) MD 3 (2005–2007) MI 3 (1998–2004) AZ 2 (2004–2004) WI 2 (1998–2003) CA 2 (2000–2005)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check