Patel test (Texas) · Go Syfert
← Texas issues

Patel test in Texas

6 Texas opinions name it 2 courts 1986–2025 4 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (3)

CaseFollowedCited
Ashish Patel, Anverali Satani, Nazira Momin, Minaz Chamadia, and Vijay Lakshmi Yogi v. Texas Department of Licensing and Regulationgreen
tex · 2015 · cited in 3 Texas opinions naming this issue, 2022–2025
2 sentences

2025The second Patel test requires Plaintiffs to show that “when considered as a whole, [section 108.052]’s actual, real-world effect as applied to [licensed master social workers] could not arguably be rationally related to, or is so burdensome as to be oppressive in light of, the governmental interest.” 469 S.W.3d at 87 .

2022The evidence showed that the Threaders were entirely shut out from practicing their trade until they completed the “oppressive” required training and that the threader trainees had to pay out-of-pocket expenses for that training “and at the same time lose the opportunity to make money actively practicing their trade.” Id. at 88–90. 537 S.W.3d 647, 656 (Tex. App.—Austin 2017, pet. denied). 11 SPI contends that the Patel test was meant to be limited to the framework in which it arose, namely “a regulatory prohibition on entry into the profession as a whole.” SPI argues that appellees are not bar

13
Texas Alcoholic Beverage Commission v. Live Oak Brewing Co.green
texapp · 2017 · cited in 1 Texas opinions naming this issue, 2022–2022
2 sentences

2022The evidence showed that the Threaders were entirely shut out from practicing their trade until they completed the “oppressive” required training and that the threader trainees had to pay out-of-pocket expenses for that training “and at the same time lose the opportunity to make money actively practicing their trade.” Id. at 88–90. 537 S.W.3d 647, 656 (Tex. App.—Austin 2017, pet. denied). 11 SPI contends that the Patel test was meant to be limited to the framework in which it arose, namely “a regulatory prohibition on entry into the profession as a whole.” SPI argues that appellees are not bar

2022The evidence showed that the Threaders were entirely shut out from practicing their trade until they completed the “oppressive” required training and that the threader trainees had to pay out-of-pocket expenses for that training “and at the same time lose the opportunity to make money actively practicing their trade.” Id. at 88–90. 537 S.W.3d 647, 656 (Tex. App.—Austin 2017, pet. denied). 11 SPI contends that the Patel test was meant to be limited to the framework in which it arose, namely “a regulatory prohibition on entry into the profession as a whole.” SPI argues that appellees are not bar

11
Hoffmann-La Roche Inc. v. Zeltwangergreen
tex · 2004 · cited in 1 Texas opinions naming this issue, 2016–2016
1 sentence

2016See Zeltwanger, 144 S.W.3d at 450 (court of appeals should render judgment for the appropriate amount of damages when the judgment awards relief on an unavailable claim,such as IIED).

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (4)

CaseCitedYears
Sessions v. Morales-Santana green
scotus · 2017
1 sentence

2022Sessions v. Morales-Santana, 137 S. Ct. 1678 , 1698–1700 (2017). 8 I cannot see how the Court could deem the statute at issue to violate Patel’s standard without dramatically changing that standard— and at the same time dramatically increasing the judiciary’s role in policymaking.

12022–2022
Collection Consultants, Inc. v. State green
texcrimapp · 1977
1 sentence

1986Patel received the instruction he requested, and under these circumstances, Patel’s motion for mistrial is considered waived by his failure to secure a ruling. 1 Collection Consultants, Inc. v. State, 556 S.W.2d 787 (Tex.Crim.App.1977), dism’d, 436 U.S. 901 , 98 S.Ct. 2228 , 56 L.Ed.2d 399 (1978).

11986–1986
Punta Gorda Isles, Inc. v. Livesay green
scotus · 1978
1 sentence

1986Patel received the instruction he requested, and under these circumstances, Patel’s motion for mistrial is considered waived by his failure to secure a ruling. 1 Collection Consultants, Inc. v. State, 556 S.W.2d 787 (Tex.Crim.App.1977), dism’d, 436 U.S. 901 , 98 S.Ct. 2228 , 56 L.Ed.2d 399 (1978).

11986–1986
Kaplan v. New Jersey green
scotus · 1978
1 sentence

1986Patel received the instruction he requested, and under these circumstances, Patel’s motion for mistrial is considered waived by his failure to secure a ruling. 1 Collection Consultants, Inc. v. State, 556 S.W.2d 787 (Tex.Crim.App.1977), dism’d, 436 U.S. 901 , 98 S.Ct. 2228 , 56 L.Ed.2d 399 (1978).

11986–1986

Where else courts name it

GA 7 (1998–2022) TX 6 (1986–2025) NY 5 (1994–2016) CA 4 (1994–2021) OK 3 (1999–2025) OH 3 (2006–2017) IL 2 (2021–2021) IN 2 (1990–2004)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check