Petition contains claim (Texas) · Go Syfert
← Texas issues

Petition contains claim in Texas

6 Texas opinions name it 2 courts 2007–2026 1 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (2)

CaseFollowedCited
SmithKline Beecham Corp. v. Doegreen
tex · 1995 · cited in 5 Texas opinions naming this issue, 2007–2018
2 sentences

2018Id. (citing SmithKline Beecham Corp., 903 S.W.2d at 354–55).

2009See SmithKline Beecham Corp., 903 S.W.2d at 354-55 .

45
Huff Energy Fund, L.P. v. Longview Energy Co.green
· 2015 · cited in 1 Texas opinions naming this issue, 2026–2026
1 sentence

2026It is also unclear the remedy Haskett believes he would be entitled to if this Court were to sustain his fourth issue. 23 declaratory relief that they had “failed to comply with Texas statute[s] and that such failure negate[d] any claimed right to force [Haskett] to pay the unlawfully assessed [f]ire [p]rotection [f]ee.” See The Huff Energy Fund, L.P. v. Longview Energy Co., 482 S.W.3d 184, 198 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2015) (“If we cannot reasonably infer that the petition contains a claim, then we must conclude that the petition does not contain th[e] claim, even under [a] liberal construction

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (2)

CaseCitedYears
Longview Energy Company v. the Huff Energy Fund Lp, Wrh Energy Partners LLC, William R. \Bill\" Huff green
· 2017
1 sentence

2026It is also unclear the remedy Haskett believes he would be entitled to if this Court were to sustain his fourth issue. 23 declaratory relief that they had “failed to comply with Texas statute[s] and that such failure negate[d] any claimed right to force [Haskett] to pay the unlawfully assessed [f]ire [p]rotection [f]ee.” See The Huff Energy Fund, L.P. v. Longview Energy Co., 482 S.W.3d 184, 198 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2015) (“If we cannot reasonably infer that the petition contains a claim, then we must conclude that the petition does not contain th[e] claim, even under [a] liberal construction

12026–2026
San Saba Energy, L.P. v. Crawford green
texapp · 2005
1 sentence

2018Id. (citing SmithKline Beecham Corp., 903 S.W.2d at 354–55).

12018–2018

Where else courts name it

TX 6 (2007–2026) CA 2 (2019–2019)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check