purpose of invoking rule (Texas) · Go Syfert
← Texas issues

purpose of invoking rule in Texas

6 Texas opinions name it 1 courts 2001–2015 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (1)

CaseFollowedCited
Russell v. Stategreen
texcrimapp · 2005 · cited in 6 Texas opinions naming this issue, 2001–2015
2 sentences

2015Cf. Russell v. State, 155 S.W.3d 176, 179-80 (Tex.Crim.App.2005) (explaining the purpose of invoking the rule is to prevent potential witnesses from being influenced by, or modifying their testimony because of, the testimony of other witnesses).

2006Russell v. State, 155 S.W.3d 176, 179-80 (Tex. Crim.

66

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Where else courts name it

AL 9 (1915–1989) CT 8 (1990–2021) TX 6 (2001–2015) FL 3 (1983–1988) MN 3 (1967–2024) NY 3 (1983–2018) MO 3 (1975–2020) MD 2 (1978–2004) KS 2 (2018–2020)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check