regression analysis (Texas) · Go Syfert
← Texas issues

regression analysis in Texas

6 Texas opinions name it 1 courts 2002–2014 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (3)

CaseFollowedCited
McClain v. Lufkin Industries, Inc.green
ca5 · 2008 · cited in 3 Texas opinions naming this issue, 2014–2014
2 sentences

2014See Bazemore, 478 U.S. at 400 , 106 S.Ct. 3000 (noting that “omission of variables from a regression analysis” may affect opinion’s probative value but not its admissibility); see also McClain v. Lufkin Indus., Inc., 519 F.3d 264, 279-80 (5th Cir.2008) (same proposition).

2014See Bazermore, 478 U.S. at 400 (noting that “omission of variables from a regression analysis” may affect opinion’s probative value but not its admissibility); see also McClain v. Lufkin Indus., Inc., 519 F.3d 264 , 279–80 (5th Cir. 2008) (same proposition).

33
Bazemore v. Fridaygreen
scotus · 1986 · cited in 3 Texas opinions naming this issue, 2014–2014
2 sentences

2014See Bazemore, 478 U.S. at 400 , 106 S.Ct. 3000 (noting that “omission of variables from a regression analysis” may affect opinion’s probative value but not its admissibility); see also McClain v. Lufkin Indus., Inc., 519 F.3d 264, 279-80 (5th Cir.2008) (same proposition).

2014See Bazemore, 478 U.S. at 400 , 106 S.Ct. 3000 (noting that “omission of variables from a regression analysis” may affect opinion’s probative value but not its admissibility); see also McClain v. Lufkin Indus., Inc., 519 F.3d 264, 279-80 (5th Cir.2008) (same proposition).

33
Harnett v. Stategreen
texapp · 2000 · cited in 2 Texas opinions naming this issue, 2002–2002
2 sentences

2002Harnett v. State , 38 S.W.3d 650, 657 (Tex. App.--Austin 2000, pet. ref'd).

2002Harnett v. State, 38 S.W.3d 650, 657 (Tex. App.CAustin 2000, pet. ref=d).

22

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (3)

CaseCitedYears
In the Matter of JAMES WILSON ASSOCIATES, Debtor. Appeals of METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY green
ca7 · 1992
1 sentence

2011Southland also relies on Matter of James Wilson Associates, 965 F.2d 160 (7th Cir.1992), in which evidence of a building’s state of repair was obtained by a consulting engineer retained by the insurer’s expert witness, an architect who planned to testify about the physical condition of the building as reported to him by the consulting engineer.

12011–2011
Dura Automotive Systems of Indiana, Inc., Formerly Known as Excel Corporation v. Cts Corporation green
ca7 · 2002
2 sentences

2011“In the words of the Dura court, Torres exercised ‘independent judgment’ that was ‘beyond [Anson’s] ken.’ ” Id. at 665-66 (quoting Dura, 285 F.3d at 613 ). 3 “With *567 respect to the regression analysis, Anson was not an expert but rather a ‘mouthpiece.’ Louis Vuitton thus produced the wrong expert to prove the reliability of the regression analysis.” Id. at 666 .

2011“In the words of the Dura court, Torres exercised ‘independent judgment’ that was ‘beyond [Anson’s] ken.’ ” Id. at 665-66 (quoting Dura, 285 F.3d at 613 ). 3 “With *567 respect to the regression analysis, Anson was not an expert but rather a ‘mouthpiece.’ Louis Vuitton thus produced the wrong expert to prove the reliability of the regression analysis.” Id. at 666 .

12011–2011
Malletier v. Dooney & Bourke, Inc. green
nysd · 2007
2 sentences

2011Anson admitted he “essentially had nothing to do with the preparation of the regression analysis” and instead, it was his practice to “turn this over to an economist.” Id.

2011Therefore, “[bjecause Anson is not qualified to conduct or interpret statistical analyses, the regression analysis could only be admissible if Anson is permitted to give an opinion by relying completely on Torres’s opinion.” Id.

12011–2011

Where else courts name it

TX 6 (2002–2014) WA 2 (2018–2018) NJ 2 (1999–2025)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check