Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Texas opinions name it 1 courts 1986–2016 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
City of Houston v. Lyons Realty, Ltd.green2 sentences2015“When a note is made in renewal of a prior obligation known by the maker to be fraudulent or without consideration, the renewal note constitutes a waiver of the defense.” Roquemore v. Nat’l Commerce Bank, 837 S.W.2d 212 , 214–15 (Tex. App.—Texarkana 1992, no writ) (citing City of Houston v. Lyons Realty, Ltd., 710 S.W.2d 625, 629 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1986, no writ)); see Cordero, 226 S.W.3d at 751–52 (affirming summary judgment for corporation because employee ratified agreement after learning of alleged fraud). 2015“When a note is made in renewal of a prior obligation known by the maker to be fraudulent or without consideration, the renewal note constitutes a waiver of the defense.” Roquemore v. Nat’l Commerce Bank, 837 S.W.2d 212 , 214–15 (Tex. App.—Texarkana 1992, no writ) (citing City of Houston v. Lyons Realty, Ltd., 710 S.W.2d 625, 629 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1986, no writ)); see Cordero, 226 S.W.3d at 751–52 (affirming summary judgment for corporation because employee ratified agreement after learning of alleged fraud). | 5 | 5 |
Cordero v. Tenet Healthcare Corp.green2 sentences2015“When a note is made in renewal of a prior obligation known by the maker to be fraudulent or without consideration, the renewal note constitutes a waiver of the defense.” Roquemore v. Nat’l Commerce Bank, 837 S.W.2d 212 , 214–15 (Tex. App.—Texarkana 1992, no writ) (citing City of Houston v. Lyons Realty, Ltd., 710 S.W.2d 625, 629 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1986, no writ)); see Cordero, 226 S.W.3d at 751–52 (affirming summary judgment for corporation because employee ratified agreement after learning of alleged fraud). 2015“When a note is made in renewal of a prior obligation known by the maker to be fraudulent or without consideration, the renewal note constitutes a waiver of the defense.” Roquemore v. Nat’l Commerce Bank, 837 S.W.2d 212 , 214–15 (Tex. App.—Texarkana 1992, no writ) (citing City of Houston v. Lyons Realty, Ltd., 710 S.W.2d 625, 629 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1986, no writ)); see Cordero, 226 S.W.3d at 751–52 (affirming summary judgment for corporation because employee ratified agreement after learning of alleged fraud). | 3 | 3 |
Hunter, Evans & Co. v. Laniusgreen2 sentences1992Hunter v. Lanius, 82 Tex. 677 , 18 S.W. 201 (1892); City of Houston v. Lyons Realty, Ltd., 710 S.W.2d 625, 629 (Tex.App. — Houston [1st Dist.] 1986, no writ). 1992Hunter v. Lanius, 82 Tex. 677 , 18 S.W. 201 (1892); City of Houston v. Lyons Realty, Ltd., 710 S.W.2d 625, 629 (Tex.App. — Houston [1st Dist.] 1986, no writ). | 1 | 2 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Roquemore v. National Commerce Bank
green
2 sentences2015“When a note is made in renewal of a prior obligation known by the maker to be fraudulent or without consideration, the renewal note constitutes a waiver of the defense.” Roquemore v. Nat’l Commerce Bank, 837 S.W.2d 212 , 214–15 (Tex. App.—Texarkana 1992, no writ) (citing City of Houston v. Lyons Realty, Ltd., 710 S.W.2d 625, 629 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1986, no writ)); see Cordero, 226 S.W.3d at 751–52 (affirming summary judgment for corporation because employee ratified agreement after learning of alleged fraud). 2015“When a note is made in renewal of a prior obligation known by the maker to be fraudulent or without consideration, the renewal note constitutes a waiver of the defense.” Roquemore v. Nat’l Commerce Bank, 837 S.W.2d 212 , 214–15 (Tex. App.—Texarkana 1992, no writ) (citing City of Houston v. Lyons Realty, Ltd., 710 S.W.2d 625, 629 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1986, no writ)); see Cordero, 226 S.W.3d at 751–52 (affirming summary judgment for corporation because employee ratified agreement after learning of alleged fraud). | 3 | 2015–2015 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.