Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Texas opinions name it 2 courts 1999–2015 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
EI Du Pont De Nemours & Co. v. Robinsongreen2 sentences2010See Robinson, 923 S.W.2d at 557 (noting that the Robinson reliability inquiry focuses "solely on the underlying principles and methodology, not on the conclusions they generate"); cf. TXI Transp. 2010See Robinson, 923 S.W.2d at 557 (noting that the Robinson reliability inquiry focuses “solely on the underlying principles and methodology, not on the conclusions they generate”); cf. TXI Transp. | 2 | 2 |
Whirlpool Corp. v. Camachogreen2 sentences2015See Id. 2013Whirlpool, 298 S.W.3d at 638 ; see motion for judgment n.o.v., it had already exercised its discretion as to the admission of evidence, the jury had rendered a verdict, and the question before the trial court was whether the jury’s findings were supported by the evidence. | 1 | 3 |
TXI Transportation Co. v. Hughesgreen2 sentences2010Co. v. Hughes, 306 S.W.3d 230, 235 (Tex.2010) ("Rather than focus entirely on the reliability of the underlying technique used to generate the challenged opinion, as in Robinson , we have found it appropriate . . . [to] determine whether there are any significant analytical gaps in the expert's opinion that undermine its reliability.") (citations omitted). 2010Co. v. Hughes, 306 S.W.3d 230, 235 (Tex.2010) (“Rather than focus entirely on the reliability of the underlying technique used to generate the challenged opinion, as in Robinson , we have found it appropriate ... [to] determine whether there are any significant analytical gaps in the expert’s opinion that undermine its reliability.”) (citations omitted). | 1 | 1 |
Gammill v. Jack Williams Chevrolet, Inc.green1 sentence1999See Gammill, 972 S.W.2d at 720, 726 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Than v. University of Texas Medical School at Houston
green
1 sentence2002Co. , 185 F.3d 496 , 506 B 07 (5th Cir. 1999), cert. denied , 528 U.S. 1160 (2000). | 1 | 2002–2002 |
Willard Rushing and Patricia Rushing v. Kansas City Southern Railway Company
green
1 sentence2002Co. , 185 F.3d 496 , 506 B 07 (5th Cir. 1999), cert. denied , 528 U.S. 1160 (2000). | 1 | 2002–2002 |