Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Texas opinions name it 2 courts 2007–2012 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Moore v. Stategreen2 sentences2011See Moore v. State, 605 S.W.2d 924, 926 (Tex. Crim. 2011See Moore v. State , 605 S.W.2d 924, 926 (Tex. Crim. | 2 | 2 |
Duron v. Stategreen2 sentences2007Ample evidence at trial showed that appellant had knowledge of Brown's felony status: Officer Burfine testified that he told Appellant that (1) the police were looking for Curtis Brown, (2) Curtis Brown was a fugitive, (3) Curtis Brown had an outstanding parole warrant and a sex offender violation warrant, and (4) both were felony warrants. [45] 956 S.W.2d 547, 551 (Tex.Crim.App.1997). [46] Id. at 550-51 ; see also Ramirez v. State, 105 S.W.3d 628, 629-30 (Tex.Crim.App.2003) ("The appellant filed a motion to dismiss the complaint based on the fact that her name was incorrectly set out. . . . 2007Ample evidence at trial showed that appellant had knowledge of Brown's felony status: Officer Burfine testified that he told Appellant that (1) the police were looking for Curtis Brown, (2) Curtis Brown was a fugitive, (3) Curtis Brown had an outstanding parole warrant and a sex offender violation warrant, and (4) both were felony warrants. [45] 956 S.W.2d 547, 551 (Tex.Crim.App.1997). [46] Id. at 550-51 ; see also Ramirez v. State, 105 S.W.3d 628, 629-30 (Tex.Crim.App.2003) ("The appellant filed a motion to dismiss the complaint based on the fact that her name was incorrectly set out. . . . | 2 | 2 |
Ramirez v. Stategreen2 sentences2007Id. at 550-51 ; see also Ramirez v. State, 105 S.W.3d 628, 629-30 (Tex.Crim.App.2003) (“The appellant filed a motion to dismiss the complaint based on the fact that her name was incorrectly set out.... 2007Ample evidence at trial showed that appellant had knowledge of Brown's felony status: Officer Burfine testified that he told Appellant that (1) the police were looking for Curtis Brown, (2) Curtis Brown was a fugitive, (3) Curtis Brown had an outstanding parole warrant and a sex offender violation warrant, and (4) both were felony warrants. [45] 956 S.W.2d 547, 551 (Tex.Crim.App.1997). [46] Id. at 550-51 ; see also Ramirez v. State, 105 S.W.3d 628, 629-30 (Tex.Crim.App.2003) ("The appellant filed a motion to dismiss the complaint based on the fact that her name was incorrectly set out. . . . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
VanNortrick v. State
green
2 sentences2012Id. at 712 . 2012Id. at 712 . | 2 | 2012–2012 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.