Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Texas opinions name it 2 courts 1990–2018 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Brady v. Marylandgreen2 sentences2010See Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83, 87 (1963); Harm v. State, 183 S.W.3d 403, 406 (Tex. Crim. 2010See Brady v. Maryland , 373 U.S. 83, 87 (1963); Harm v. State , 183 S.W.3d 403, 406 (Tex. Crim. | 2 | 2 |
Harm v. Stategreen2 sentences2010See Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83, 87 (1963); Harm v. State, 183 S.W.3d 403, 406 (Tex. Crim. 2010See Brady v. Maryland , 373 U.S. 83, 87 (1963); Harm v. State , 183 S.W.3d 403, 406 (Tex. Crim. | 2 | 2 |
Hightower v. Stategreen1 sentence1990Appellant relies upon Hightower v. State, 629 S.W.2d 920, 925 (Tex.Crim.App. [Panel Op.] 1981) to support his position that witnesses should be disclosed if they will be used by the State at any stage in the trial. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
LBL Oil Co. v. International Power Services, Inc.
green
1 sentence2018LBL Oil Co. v. International Power Service, Inc., involved a post-answer default judgment rendered without notice to a party who had made a general appearance in the case by filing a motion to dismiss. 777 S.W.2d 390 , 390–91 (Tex. 1989). 5 Although Mother does not explicitly argue in her brief that the trial court erred by determining that the pleading amendment did not work a surprise to her under rule 63, Mother does rely on her trial argument that she lacked time to obtain evidence regarding the name change; thus, we consider whether the amendment operated as a surprise to her as a subsidi | 1 | 2018–2018 |
Hughes v. State
green
1 sentence2015App. 1999). “…[G]rafting a surprise requirement would contravene the plain language of Rule 607…” Id. at 5 . | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Pelton v. State
green
2 sentences1999Pelton v. State, 167 Tex.Crim. 649 , 322 S.W.2d 529 (1959). 1999Pelton v. State, 167 Tex.Crim. 649 , 322 S.W.2d 529 (1959). | 1 | 1999–1999 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.