Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Texas opinions name it 1 courts 2005–2012 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Morales v. Martin Resources, Inc.green2 sentences2011Morales v. Martin Res., Inc., 183 S.W.3d 469, 471 (Tex. App.––Eastland 2005, no pet.). 9 Calhoun argues on appeal that Appellee did not prove in the trial court that it was his employer. 2011Morales v. Martin Res., Inc. , 183 S.W.3d 469, 471 (Tex. App.––Eastland 2005, no pet.). | 3 | 3 |
Warnke v. Nabors Drilling USA, L.P.green2 sentences2012Exxon Corp. v. Perez, 842 S.W.2d 629, 630-31 (Tex.1992); Warnke v. Nabors Drilling USA, L.P., 358 S.W.3d 338, 343 (Tex.App.-Houston [1st Dist.] 2011, no pet.). 2012Exxon Corp. v. Perez, 842 S.W.2d 629 , 630–31 (Tex. 1992); Warnke v. Nabors Drilling USA, L.P., 358 S.W.3d 338, 343 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2011, no pet.). | 2 | 2 |
Exxon Corp. v. Perezgreen2 sentences2012Exxon Corp. v. Perez, 842 S.W.2d 629, 630-31 (Tex.1992); Warnke v. Nabors Drilling USA, L.P., 358 S.W.3d 338, 343 (Tex.App.-Houston [1st Dist.] 2011, no pet.). 2012Exxon Corp. v. Perez, 842 S.W.2d 629 , 630–31 (Tex. 1992); Warnke v. Nabors Drilling USA, L.P., 358 S.W.3d 338, 343 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2011, no pet.). | 1 | 2 |
Western Steel Co., Inc. v. Altenburggreen1 sentence2005Western Steel Company, Inc. v. Altenburg, supra at 349; Pierce v. Holiday, 155 S.W.3d 676, 678 (Tex.App.-Texarkana 2005, no pet’n). | 1 | 1 |
Pierce v. Holidaygreen1 sentence2005Western Steel Company, Inc. v. Altenburg, supra at 349; Pierce v. Holiday, 155 S.W.3d 676, 678 (Tex.App.-Texarkana 2005, no pet’n). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.