Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Virginia opinions name it 2 courts 2009–2025 5 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Virginia courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Carr v. Home Insurancegreen2 sentences2025However, the Supreme Court in Pulte Home went on to reject an equitable indemnification claim for two reasons: first, “because the claim for indemnification did not arise out of a contractual relationship”; and, second, “because there has been no determination that any act or omission of [the defendant] caused the damage [to the property].” Id. at 528-29 (emphasis added). 2025However, the Supreme Court in Pulte Home went on to reject an equitable indemnification claim for two reasons: first, “because the claim for indemnification did not arise out of a contractual relationship”; and, second, “because there has been no determination that any act or omission of [the defendant] caused the damage [to the property].” Id. at 528-29 (emphasis added). | 5 | 5 |
CSX Transportation, Inc. v. Titan America, L.L.C.green1 sentence2009L.L.C., 72 Va. Cir. 593, 595 (2004)). | 1 | 1 |
Williams Ex Rel. Estate of Williams v. United Statesgreen1 sentence2009The United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia has stated that “an equitable indemnification claim ‘is assertable ... as long as there is an allegation of negligence on the part of another alleged joint tortfeasor’.” Williams v. United States, 469 F. Supp. 2d 339, 342 (2007) (quoting CSX Transp., Inc. v. Titan Am. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Virginia. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.