Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Vermont opinions name it 2 courts 1997–2024 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Vermont courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Town of Randolph v. Estate of Whitegreen2 sentences2018To satisfy due process, an agency, prior to assessing a penalty, must inform the parties of "(1) the factual basis for the deprivation, (2) the action to be taken against them, and (3) the procedures available to challenge the action." Id . at 284, 693 A.2d at 696 . ¶ 11. 2009Our Supreme Court has noted that “three [constitutional] requirements must be met for the contents of a notice [of alleged zoning violation] to satisfy due process: the notice must inform the parties of (1) the factual basis for the deprivation, (2) the action to be taken against them, and (3) the procedures available to challenge the action.” Town of Randolph v. Estate of White, 166 Vt. 280, 284 (1997). | 3 | 4 |
Grannis v. Ordeangreen1 sentence2024Due process, however, “does not impose an unattainable standard of accuracy.” Grannis v. Ordean, 234 U.S. 385, 395 (1914). | 1 | 1 |
Packard v. Gordongreen1 sentence1997See also Packard v. Gordon, 148 Vt. 579, 585-86 , 537 A.2d *285 140, 144 (1987) (failure to inform plaintiff of right to hearing to contest dismissal from Vermont Police Academy violated plaintiff’s due process rights). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Vermont. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.