Edmon factors (Washington) · Go Syfert
← Washington issues

Edmon factors in Washington

6 Washington opinions name it 1 courts 1998–2017 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Washington courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (1)

CaseFollowedCited
State v. Mooregreen
nj · 1988 · cited in 1 Washington opinions naming this issue, 1998–1998
2 sentences

1998Compare State v. Moore, 113 N.J. 239, 286-89 , 550 A.2d 117, 140-41 (1988) (reversing murder conviction of defendant with DID due to trial court’s failure to instruct on diminished capacity).

1998Compare State v. Moore, 113 N.J. 239, 286-89 , 550 A.2d 117, 140-41 (1988) (reversing murder conviction of defendant with DID due to trial court’s failure to instruct on diminished capacity).

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (2)

CaseCitedYears
State v. Ellis green
wash · 1998
2 sentences

2017In State v. Ellis, 136 Wn.2d 498, 522-23 , 963 P.2d 843 (1998), our Supreme Court declined to adopt the Edmon factors as absolute, and instead held that in determining the admissibility of expert testimony a trial court should consider the evidence under ER 702, 401, and 402.

2017In State v. Ellis, 136 Wn.2d 498, 522-23 , 963 P.2d 843 (1998), our Supreme Court declined to adopt the Edmon factors as absolute, and instead held that in determining the admissibility of expert testimony a trial court should consider the evidence under ER 702, 401, and 402.

52000–2017
State v. Greene green
wash · 1999
2 sentences

2000Although the Ellis Court did not expressly overrule the Edmon factors, any uncertainty about the holding of Ellis was resolved in State v. Greene, 139 Wn.2d 64 , 984 P.2d 1024 (1999): ER 702 controls the analysis for both insanity and diminished capacity.

2000Although the Ellis Court did not expressly overrule the Edmon factors, any uncertainty about the holding of Ellis was resolved in State v. Greene, 139 Wn.2d 64 , 984 P.2d 1024 (1999): ER 702 controls the analysis for both insanity and diminished capacity.

22000–2000

Statutes the citing opinions construe

WA § Wash. Rev. Code § 2.06.040 (3)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check