excellent statement rule (Washington) · Go Syfert
← Washington issues

excellent statement rule in Washington

6 Washington opinions name it 1 courts 1941–1969 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Washington courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (0)

CaseFollowedCited
No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington.

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (5)

CaseCitedYears
In Re Living Trust Created by Atwood green
minn · 1949
2 sentences

1961Because of the varying factual situations that may be involved, it is difficult to express a “rule of thumb” — except in the broadest of terms — to guide a trial court in the allowance of attorneys’ fees from the assets of a trust. 1 We find an excellent statement of the rule applicable to the instant case in In re Atwood’s Trust v. Holmes, 227 Minn. 495, 501 , 35 N. W. (2d) 736 , 9 A. L.

1961Because of the varying factual situations that may be involved, it is difficult to express a “rule of thumb” — except in the broadest of terms — to guide a trial court in the allowance of attorneys’ fees from the assets of a trust. 1 We find an excellent statement of the rule applicable to the instant case in In re Atwood’s Trust v. Holmes, 227 Minn. 495, 501 , 35 N. W. (2d) 736 , 9 A. L.

21961–1961
Ditmar v. Ditmar green
wash · 1956
2 sentences

1969An excellent statement of the rule appears in Ditmar v. Ditmar, 48 Wn.2d 373 , 293 P.2d 759 (1956): The court’s jurisdiction to enforce support-money judgments is predicated upon the continued dependency of the children in question.

1969An excellent statement of the rule appears in Ditmar v. Ditmar, 48 Wn.2d 373 , 293 P.2d 759 (1956): The court’s jurisdiction to enforce support-money judgments is predicated upon the continued dependency of the children in question.

11969–1969
O'Neil v. Building Service Employees International Union, Local No. 6 neutral
wash · 1941
1 sentence

1942An excellent statement of the rule is found in O’Neil v. Building Service Employees International Union, 9 Wn. (2d) 507, 115 P. (2d) 662 , in which this court held: “The allegations of fact, together with the reasonable inferences therefrom, in the complaint, are admitted by the demurrer to be true; that is, the demurrer admits the truth of all well pleaded facts, as well, also, as every legitimate inference deduced from such facts.

11942–1942
Barton v. State green
ohio · 1849
1 sentence

1941And even when, under the statute, the ownership is vested in the public, if the authorities entirely relinquish the use of the land, or the use for which the land was dedicated becomes impossible, the land has been held to revert to the original dedicator, or to persons claiming under him.” In Board of Education etc. v. Edson, 18 Ohio St. 221 , 98 Am.

11941–1941
State ex rel. Yeargin v. Maschke neutral
wash · 1916
2 sentences

1941Yeargin v. Maschke, 90 Wash. 249 , 155 Pac. 1064 , is an excellent statement of our rule: “The general rule, of course, is that the discretionary power of the board of county commissioners is not subject to review by the court.

1941Yeargin v. Maschke, 90 Wash. 249 , 155 Pac. 1064 , is an excellent statement of our rule: “The general rule, of course, is that the discretionary power of the board of county commissioners is not subject to review by the court.

11941–1941

Where else courts name it

WA 6 (1941–1969) CA 5 (1943–1956) TX 5 (1934–1976) KY 4 (1950–1974) AR 3 (1927–1948) IN 3 (1933–1983) NJ 2 (1950–1959) IL 2 (1975–1978) TN 2 (1940–1961) AL 2 (1976–1985) ID 2 (1956–1960) ND 2 (1913–1957) OR 2 (1918–1925) PA 2 (1928–1982)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check