Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Texas opinions name it 1 courts 1934–1976 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Poenisch v. Quarnstromgreen1 sentence1976An excellent statement of the rule is set forth in Poeniseh v. Quarnstrom, 361 S.W.2d 367 at 369 (Tex.1962); it quotes from Phillipson v. Flynn, 83 Tex. 580 , 19 S.W. 136 (1892), and reaffirmed in Southern Pine Lumber Company v. Hart, supra, as follows: “ ‘The possession of a co-tenant or tenant in common will be presumed to be in right of the common title. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Ford v. Magnolia Petroleum Co.
green
2 sentences1960An excellent statement of the rule is found in Moseley v. City of Dallas, Tex.Com.App., 17 S.W.2d 36, 41 , per Judge Critz, as follows: ‘Since the board of education of the city of Dallas has the power and authority, under the Constitution and laws of this state, and the charter of said city, to exercise sound judgment and discretion in performing and carrying out the powers and duties required of them by law, the courts will not interfere with them in the exercise of such powers, unless there is a clear abuse of their discretion, or a violation of law, for to do so where there is no abuse of 1945An excellent statement of the rule is found in Moseley v. City of Dallas, Tex.Com.App., 17 S.W.2d 36, 41 , per Judge Critz, as follows: “Since the board of education of the city of Dallas has the power and authority, under the Constitution and laws of this state, and the charter of said city, to exercise sound judgment and discretion in performing and carrying out the powers and duties required of them by law, the courts will not interfere with them in the exercise of such powers, unless there is a clear abuse of their discretion, or a violation of law, for to do so where there is no abuse of | 2 | 1945–1960 |
Phillipson v. Flynn
green
2 sentences1976An excellent statement of the rule is set forth in Poeniseh v. Quarnstrom, 361 S.W.2d 367 at 369 (Tex.1962); it quotes from Phillipson v. Flynn, 83 Tex. 580 , 19 S.W. 136 (1892), and reaffirmed in Southern Pine Lumber Company v. Hart, supra, as follows: “ ‘The possession of a co-tenant or tenant in common will be presumed to be in right of the common title. 1976An excellent statement of the rule is set forth in Poeniseh v. Quarnstrom, 361 S.W.2d 367 at 369 (Tex.1962); it quotes from Phillipson v. Flynn, 83 Tex. 580 , 19 S.W. 136 (1892), and reaffirmed in Southern Pine Lumber Company v. Hart, supra, as follows: “ ‘The possession of a co-tenant or tenant in common will be presumed to be in right of the common title. | 1 | 1976–1976 |
Kissick v. Garland Independent School District
green
1 sentence1960An excellent statement of the rule is found in Moseley v. City of Dallas, Tex.Com.App., 17 S.W.2d 36, 41 , per Judge Critz, as follows: ‘Since the board of education of the city of Dallas has the power and authority, under the Constitution and laws of this state, and the charter of said city, to exercise sound judgment and discretion in performing and carrying out the powers and duties required of them by law, the courts will not interfere with them in the exercise of such powers, unless there is a clear abuse of their discretion, or a violation of law, for to do so where there is no abuse of | 1 | 1960–1960 |
Porter v. Pequonnoc Manufacturing Co.
green
1 sentence1954Co., 1845, 17 Conn. 249 . | 1 | 1954–1954 |
City of New Braunfels v. Waldschmidt
green
2 sentences1945R.C.L. vol. 24, p. 575; City of New Braunfels v. Waldschmidt, 109 Tex. 302 , 207 S.W. 303 .” Before adopting the regulation involved in this appeal, appellee School Board proceeded very cautiously. 1945R.C.L. vol. 24, p. 575; City of New Braunfels v. Waldschmidt, 109 Tex. 302 , 207 S.W. 303 .” Before adopting the regulation involved in this appeal, appellee School Board proceeded very cautiously. | 1 | 1945–1945 |
Downard v. National Loan & Investment Co.
neutral
2 sentences1934App. 570 , 55 S. W. 981 , is an excellent statement of this rule, typical of our lamented Chief Justice Conner. 1934App. 570 , 55 S.W. 981 , is an excellent statement of this rule, typical of our lamented Chief Justice Conner. | 1 | 1934–1934 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.