6 Washington opinions name it 2 courts 2010–2023 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Washington courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Iwai v. Stategreen2 sentences2023Id. (citing Iwai, 129 Wn.2d at 103 (Alexander, J., concurring)). 7 For the current opinion, go to https://www.lexisnexis.com/clients/wareports/. 2021The expansion of the exception began in Iwai v. State, 129 Wn.2d 84 , 915 P.2d 1089 (1996) (plurality opinion). | 1 | 2 |
Morgan v. City of Federal Waygreen1 sentence2010See id. (“The presence of a third person during the communication waives the privilege, unless the third person is necessary for the communication, or has retained the attorney on a matter of ‘common interest.’ ” (citations omitted) (quoting Broyles, 147 Wn. | 1 | 1 |
Morgan v. City of Federal Waygreen1 sentence2010See id. ("The presence of a third person during the communication waives the privilege, unless the third person is necessary for the communication, or has retained the attorney on a matter of `common interest.'" (citations omitted)). | 1 | 1 |
Broyles v. Thurston Countygreen1 sentence2010See id. (“The presence of a third person during the communication waives the privilege, unless the third person is necessary for the communication, or has retained the attorney on a matter of ‘common interest.’ ” (citations omitted) (quoting Broyles, 147 Wn. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Iwai v. State
green
2 sentences2023Id. (citing Iwai, 129 Wn.2d at 103 (Alexander, J., concurring)). 7 For the current opinion, go to https://www.lexisnexis.com/clients/wareports/. 2021The expansion of the exception began in Iwai v. State, 129 Wn.2d 84 , 915 P.2d 1089 (1996) (plurality opinion). | 2 | 2021–2023 |
Wiltse v. Albertson's Inc.
green
1 sentence2021While Wiltse’s holding that “[r]isk of water dripping from 11 Johnson (Darcy L.) v. Liquor & Cannabis Bd. (No. 98726-2) a leaky roof is not inherent in a store’s mode of operation” may at first seem to foreclose including slip-and-fall cases within the ambit of the exception, this is not the case. 116 Wn.2d at 461 . | 1 | 2021–2021 |
Gross v. City of Lynnwood
green
1 sentence2016Gross, 90 Wn.2d at 400 ; T.A.W., 188 Wn. | 1 | 2016–2016 |
R.B. v. C.W.
green
1 sentence2016Gross, 90 Wn.2d at 400 ; T.A.W., 188 Wn. | 1 | 2016–2016 |
State v. Hughes
green
1 sentence2014Land relied for its same "in fact and in law" analysis upon State v. Hughes, 166 Wn.2d 675 , 212 P.3d 558 (2009). | 1 | 2014–2014 |
State v. Hughes
green
1 sentence2014Land relied for its same "in fact and in law" analysis upon State v. Hughes, 166 Wn.2d 675 , 212 P.3d 558 (2009). | 1 | 2014–2014 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.