Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Florida opinions name it 2 courts 1962–2018 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Florida courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Miami Home Milk Producers Asso. v. Milk Control Boardgreen1 sentence2018See Milk Control Bd. , 169 So. at 544 (explaining that this Court is bound by decisions of the United States Supreme Court on questions of United States constitutional law). 7 Of course, neither proposition could occur. *22 Nevertheless, the majority opines that the Moss panel erred and came into conflict with Welch by quoting the United States Supreme Court's decision in Smith because Smith leaves out a purported independent third inquiry, supposedly recognized in Welch as an expansion of the rule set forth in Smith , majority op. at 13, that (c) "the accused be reminded of his or her rights" | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Florida. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Pennoyer v. Neff
red
2 sentences1967Co., 1957, 355 U.S. 220, 221 , 78 S.Ct. 199, 200 , 2 L.Ed.2d 223 , had this to say: `Since Pennoyer v. Neff, 5 Otto 714 , 95 U.S. 714 , 24 L.Ed. 565 , this Court has held that the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment places some limit on the power of state courts to enter binding judgments against persons not served with process within their boundaries. 1967Co., 1957, 355 U.S. 220, 221 , 78 S.Ct. 199, 200 , 2 L.Ed.2d 223 , had this to say: `Since Pennoyer v. Neff, 5 Otto 714 , 95 U.S. 714 , 24 L.Ed. 565 , this Court has held that the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment places some limit on the power of state courts to enter binding judgments against persons not served with process within their boundaries. | 2 | 1962–1967 |
McGee v. International Life Insurance
green
2 sentences1967Co., 1957, 355 U.S. 220, 221 , 78 S.Ct. 199, 200 , 2 L.Ed.2d 223 , had this to say: `Since Pennoyer v. Neff, 5 Otto 714 , 95 U.S. 714 , 24 L.Ed. 565 , this Court has held that the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment places some limit on the power of state courts to enter binding judgments against persons not served with process within their boundaries. 1967Co., 1957, 355 U.S. 220, 221 , 78 S.Ct. 199, 200 , 2 L.Ed.2d 223 , had this to say: `Since Pennoyer v. Neff, 5 Otto 714 , 95 U.S. 714 , 24 L.Ed. 565 , this Court has held that the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment places some limit on the power of state courts to enter binding judgments against persons not served with process within their boundaries. | 2 | 1962–1967 |
Whitt v. Silverman
green
1 sentence2007I do not agree with regard to the extension of liability and the expansion of the analysis employed in Whitt v. Silverman, 788 So.2d 210 (Fla. 2001), to the passive landowner circumstances presented in the instant case. | 1 | 2007–2007 |
Baxley v. State
green
1 sentence1982Even if the conduct of the prosecutor was improper (a point we expressly do not decide), the trial judge did not find that it was action calculated in bad faith to provoke a mistrial. [2] There was no error in denying the motion to dismiss. *1295 Appellants have filed supplementary briefs claiming insufficiency of the informations to allege the intent of defendants to permanently deprive the victim of his property, relying on Baxley v. State, 411 So.2d 194 (Fla. 5th DCA, 1981). | 1 | 1982–1982 |
In the Matter of Standard Jury Instructions
green
1 sentence1978In the matter of the use by the trial courts of Standard Jury Instructions in Criminal Cases, 327 So.2d 6 (Fla. 1976). | 1 | 1978–1978 |
Woodring v. Crown Engineering Co.
green
1 sentence1967In Woodring v. Crown Engineering Co., Fla.App. 1962, 141 So.2d 816, 818 , when this court had under consideration Section 47.16, F.S.A., which provides for service of process upon nonresidents engaging in business in this State, this court stated: "In tracing the expansion of the doctrine enunciated in Pennoyer v. Neff, the Supreme Court of the United States, *784 speaking through Mr. Justice Black in McGee v. International Life Ins. | 1 | 1967–1967 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.