general offset rule (Washington) · Go Syfert
← Washington issues

general offset rule in Washington

7 Washington opinions name it 1 courts 2000–2026 2 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Washington courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (0)

CaseFollowedCited
No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington.

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (1)

CaseCitedYears
Frazier v. Department of Labor & Industries green
washctapp · 2000
2 sentences

2000Subsection (d) of 42 U.S.C. § 424a contains an exception to the general offset rule; it allows for a "reverse offset." Frazier v. Department of Labor & Indus., 101 Wash.App. 411, 416 , 3 P.3d 221 (2000).

2000Subsection (d) of 42 U.S.C. § 424a contains an exception to the general offset rule: it allows for a “reverse offset.” Frazier v. Department of Labor & Indus., 101 Wn.

72000–2026

Statutes the citing opinions construe

USC § 42u.s.c.424a (6) USC § 42u.s.c.424a(d) (6) WA § Wash. Rev. Code § 51.32.220 (5) WA § Wash. Rev. Code § 51.32.225 (5) WA § Wash. Rev. Code § 51.32.090 (3) WA § Wash. Rev. Code § 51.52.140 (3)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check