inclusionary clause (Washington) · Go Syfert
← Washington issues

inclusionary clause in Washington

6 Washington opinions name it 2 courts 1998–2015 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Washington courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (2)

CaseFollowedCited
Tokley v. State Farm Insurance Companiesgreen
sdd · 1992 · cited in 2 Washington opinions naming this issue, 1998–1998
2 sentences

1998Cos., 782 F. Supp. 1375, 1378 (D.S.D. 1992) (holding that the definition of “relative” is a provision that defines the persons to whom coverage is extended, as opposed to defining persons excluded from coverage, and is therefore an inclusionary clause).

1998Cos., 782 F.Supp. 1375, 1378 (1992) (holding that the definition of "relative" is a provision that defines the persons to whom coverage is extended, as opposed to defining persons excluded from coverage, and is therefore an inclusionary clause).

22
Hawaiian Insurance & Guaranty Co. v. Federated American Insurancegreen
washctapp · 1975 · cited in 2 Washington opinions naming this issue, 1998–1998
2 sentences

1998App. 7, 8, 20 , 534 P.2d 48 , 93 A.L.R.3d 407 (1975) (indicating that phrase “ ‘resident of the same household’ ” was to be interpreted liberally as an inclusionary clause).

1998App. 7, 8, 20 , 534 P.2d 48 , 93 A.L.R.3d 407 (1975) (indicating that phrase “ ‘resident of the same household’ ” was to be interpreted liberally as an inclusionary clause).

12

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (2)

CaseCitedYears
American Star Insurance v. Grice green
wash · 1993
2 sentences

2015Co. v. Grice, 121 Wn.2d 869, 874 , 854 P.2d 622 (1993). “ An inclusionary clause in an insurance contract should be liberally construed to provide coverage whenever possible.’" Mer cer Place Condo.

2015Co. v. Grice, 121 Wn.2d 869, 874 , 854 P.2d 622 (1993). “ An inclusionary clause in an insurance contract should be liberally construed to provide coverage whenever possible.’" Mer cer Place Condo.

22015–2015
Riley v. VIKING INSURANCE CO. green
washctapp · 1987
2 sentences

2001Co., 46 Wash.App. 828, 829 , 733 P.2d 556 (1987) (citing Pierce v. Aetna Cas. & Sur.

2001Co., 46 Wash.App. 828, 829 , 733 P.2d 556 (1987) (citing Pierce v. Aetna Cas. & Sur.

22000–2001

Where else courts name it

NE 24 (1985–2026) UT 11 (2005–2025) MI 9 (2016–2022) WA 6 (1998–2015) CA 5 (1964–2001) TX 4 (1992–2008) OR 3 (1992–1998) VT 3 (2021–2023) AL 2 (2004–2005) WI 2 (2009–2009) RI 2 (2006–2006) SD 2 (2008–2008) NJ 2 (1977–1995) PA 2 (2015–2015)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check