parallel federal rule (Washington) · Go Syfert
← Washington issues

parallel federal rule in Washington

6 Washington opinions name it 2 courts 1990–2019 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Washington courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (3)

CaseFollowedCited
David H. Bruce v. United Statesgreen
ca9 · 1985 · cited in 2 Washington opinions naming this issue, 2019–2019
2 sentences

2019See, e.g., Bruce v. U.S., 759 F.2d 755, 758 (9th Cir. 1985).

2019See, e.q., Bruce v. U.S., 759 F.2d 755, 758 (9th Cir. 1985).

22
United States v. Marvin P. Jonesgreen
ca11 · 1994 · cited in 1 Washington opinions naming this issue, 2016–2016
1 sentence

2016Courts applying the parallel federal rule have recognized "that a 'court may take judicial notice of a document filed in another court not for the truth of the matters asserted in the other litigation, but rather to establish the fact of such litigation and related filings.''' United States v. Jones, 29 F.3d 1549, 1553 (11th Cir. 1994) (quoting Liberty Mut.

11
cluster 578699green
ca1 · 1992 · cited in 1 Washington opinions naming this issue, 1998–1998
1 sentence

1998Lines, 889 F.2d at 249 ; First RepublicBank Fort Worth v. Norglass, Inc., 958 F.2d 117, 120 (5th Cir. 1992) (citing Dunlop v. Pan Am.

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (3)

CaseCitedYears
In Re Pacific Far East Lines, Inc. green
ca9 · 1989
1 sentence

1998Lines, 889 F.2d at 249 ; First RepublicBank Fort Worth v. Norglass, Inc., 958 F.2d 117, 120 (5th Cir. 1992) (citing Dunlop v. Pan Am.

11998–1998
American Mobile Homes of Washington, Inc. v. Seattle-First National Bank green
wash · 1990
2 sentences

1997American Mobile Homes of Wash., Inc. v. Seattle-First Nat’l Bank, 115 Wn.2d 307, 313 , 796 P.2d 1276 (1990).

1997American Mobile Homes of Wash., Inc. v. Seattle-First Nat’l Bank, 115 Wn.2d 307, 313 , 796 P.2d 1276 (1990).

11997–1997
American Discount Corp. v. Saratoga West, Inc. green
wash · 1972
2 sentences

1990American Discount Corp. v. Saratoga West, Inc., 81 Wn.2d 34, 37 , 499 P.2d 869 (1972).

1990American Discount Corp. v. Saratoga West, Inc., 81 Wn.2d 34, 37 , 499 P.2d 869 (1972).

11990–1990

Where else courts name it

MA 21 (1981–2023) WA 6 (1990–2019) CA 6 (2016–2020) MS 5 (2001–2020) IA 5 (2017–2021) HI 4 (2003–2011) UT 3 (2014–2017) OR 3 (1992–2015) MN 3 (1989–2012) MI 3 (1992–2025) NJ 3 (1977–2017) DC 2 (1981–1984) AK 2 (1977–1994) DE 2 (1992–2025) AZ 2 (1986–1987) KS 2 (1970–2021) AL 2 (2004–2008) FL 2 (1960–2003) VT 2 (2003–2004) WY 2 (1992–2000) LA 2 (2005–2016) ME 2 (1975–2020)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check