party raising challenge (Washington) · Go Syfert
← Washington issues

party raising challenge in Washington

6 Washington opinions name it 1 courts 1981–2026 4 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Washington courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (0)

CaseFollowedCited
No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington.

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (6)

CaseCitedYears
Sunnyside Valley Irr. Dist. v. Dickie green
wash · 2003
2 sentences

2026If the court “verifies that both elements are true, or is unable to verify that they are not true,” it must “set a hearing to determine whether the litigation meets the definition of abusive litigation.” Id.

2026If the court “verifies that both elements are true, or is unable to verify that they are not true,” it must “set a hearing to determine whether the litigation meets the definition of abusive litigation.” Id.

22026–2026
Batson v. Kentucky green
scotus · 1986
1 sentence

2021A party raising a challenge to a peremptory excusal under Batson must “first demonstrate that the struck juror is a member of a ‘cognizable [constitutionally protected] group.’ ” Erickson, 188 Wn.2d at 732 (quoting Batson, 476 U.S. at 96 ).14 Then the objecting party must make a prima facie showing that the challenge was exercised for a discriminatory purpose.

12021–2021
In Re Davis green
wash · 2004
1 sentence

2021To overcome this presumption, the party raising the challenge “must provide specific facts establishing bias.” Id.

12021–2021
State v. O'Hara green
wash · 2009
1 sentence

2020A party raising such an error must show that the error is manifest and “truly of constitutional dimension.” State v. O’Hara, 167 Wn.2d 91, 98 , 217 P.3d 756 (2009).

12020–2020
State v. O'HARA green
wash · 2009
1 sentence

2020A party raising such an error must show that the error is manifest and “truly of constitutional dimension.” State v. O’Hara, 167 Wn.2d 91, 98 , 217 P.3d 756 (2009).

12020–2020
Rutter v. Rutter green
wash · 1962
2 sentences

1981Rutter v. Rutter, 59 Wn.2d 781 , 370 P.2d 862 (1962).

1981Rutter v. Rutter, 59 Wn.2d 781 , 370 P.2d 862 (1962).

11981–1981

Statutes the citing opinions construe

WA § Wash. Rev. Code § 2.06.040 (3)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

LA 60 (1999–2024) CT 36 (1979–2020) TX 26 (1983–2023) IL 21 (1973–2026) MO 17 (1980–2023) TN 13 (1965–2019) OH 13 (1995–2024) NY 11 (1983–2015) CA 10 (1976–2023) NC 9 (1994–2017) IN 9 (1987–2020) PA 7 (1989–2024) NJ 7 (1982–2014) MA 6 (1985–2024) WA 6 (1981–2026) DE 5 (1978–2025) NM 5 (1985–2015) AK 5 (1997–2023) FL 5 (1983–2025) MD 4 (1994–2020) KS 4 (1978–2022) ME 4 (2003–2018) UT 3 (2009–2021) AL 3 (1990–2008) WI 3 (1982–2023) ND 3 (1977–1997) GA 3 (2005–2015) HI 2 (1980–2025) DC 2 (1974–1996) VA 2 (1994–2024) CO 2 (1998–2026) OR 2 (2004–2005) IA 2 (2024–2024) MT 2 (1989–2000)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check