Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
17 Missouri opinions name it 1 courts 1980–2023 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Missouri courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Foreclosures of Liens for Delinquent Land Taxes Ex Rel. Collector of Revenue v. Bhattigreen2 sentences2023In re Foreclosures of Liens for Delinquent Land Taxes by Action in rem Collector of Revenue v. Bhatti, 334 S.W.3d 444, 448-49 (Mo. banc 2011) (citing Jones v. Flowers, 547 USS. 220, 226 (2006)); see also Usery v. Turner Elkhorn Mining Co., 428 US. 1, 15 (1976) (noting the party raising a challenge on due-process grounds bears the burden to prove a violation occurred). 2023“With hundreds of properties subject to tax lien foreclosure ... notions of due process and statutory law do not require the sheriff [or other government actor] to take any further steps to find property owners absent knowledge that notice was not received.” Bhatti, 334 S.W.3d at 451 (finding no due process violation occurred in a City of St. | 1 | 1 |
Alexander v. Stategreen1 sentence2022See Alsup, 588 S.W.3d at 193-94; See also Davis, 193 S.W.3d at 763 (citing Kanagawa v. State, 685 S.W.2d 831, 835 (Mo. banc 1985), overruled on other grounds by Alexander v. State, 756 S.W.2d 539 (Mo. banc 1988)). | 1 | 1 |
Kanagawa v. State by and Through Freemangreen1 sentence2022See Alsup, 588 S.W.3d at 193-94; See also Davis, 193 S.W.3d at 763 (citing Kanagawa v. State, 685 S.W.2d 831, 835 (Mo. banc 1985), overruled on other grounds by Alexander v. State, 756 S.W.2d 539 (Mo. banc 1988)). | 1 | 1 |
Davis v. Lambert-St. Louis International Airportgreen1 sentence2022See Alsup, 588 S.W.3d at 193-94; See also Davis, 193 S.W.3d at 763 (citing Kanagawa v. State, 685 S.W.2d 831, 835 (Mo. banc 1985), overruled on other grounds by Alexander v. State, 756 S.W.2d 539 (Mo. banc 1988)). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Crewsgreen1 sentence2012See generally Ozark Air Lines, Inc. v. Valley Oil Co., L.L.C., 239 S.W.3d 140,145 (Mo.App. | 1 | 1 |
Business Men's Assurance Co. of America v. Grahamgreen1 sentence2002Business Men’s Assurance Co. v. Graham, 984 S.W.2d 501, 507 (Mo. banc 1999). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Missouri. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
James v. Union Electric Co.
green
2 sentences2004James, 978 S.W.2d at 374 . 2001James, 978 S.W.2d at 374 . | 7 | 1999–2004 |
Murry v. Mercantile Bank, N.A.
green
1 sentence2005Id. | 1 | 2005–2005 |
Sexton v. Jenkins & Associates, Inc.
green
1 sentence2004Id. | 1 | 2004–2004 |
State Ex Rel. J.E. Jones Construction Co. v. Sanders
green
2 sentences2002Sanders, 875 S.W.2d at 157 . 2002Sanders, 875 S.W.2d at 157 . | 1 | 2002–2002 |
Burns v. Employer Health Services, Inc.
green
1 sentence2000Burns, 976 S.W.2d at 641 . | 1 | 2000–2000 |
DuBose v. Flightsafety International, Inc.
green
1 sentence1998Id. | 1 | 1998–1998 |
Wesson v. Wesson
green
1 sentence1980Thus, these parties were estopped to assert contract in later [decision].” Nelson v. Nelson, supra, at 580 ; citing from Wesson v. Wesson, supra and Gunnerson v. Gunnerson, supra. This is meaningful in the present case because the appellant was represented by competent counsel throughout the dissolution and motions to modify, counsel very familiar with settlement agree ments and domestic relations law, and yet appellant persisted in using court enforcement methods for statutory alimony rather then the appropriate contract remedies. | 1 | 1980–1980 |
Gunnerson v. Gunnerson
green
1 sentence1980Thus, these parties were estopped to assert contract in later [decision].” Nelson v. Nelson, supra, at 580 ; citing from Wesson v. Wesson, supra and Gunnerson v. Gunnerson, supra. This is meaningful in the present case because the appellant was represented by competent counsel throughout the dissolution and motions to modify, counsel very familiar with settlement agree ments and domestic relations law, and yet appellant persisted in using court enforcement methods for statutory alimony rather then the appropriate contract remedies. | 1 | 1980–1980 |
Nelson v. Nelson
green
1 sentence1980Thus, these parties were estopped to assert contract in later [decision].” Nelson v. Nelson, supra, at 580 ; citing from Wesson v. Wesson, supra and Gunnerson v. Gunnerson, supra. This is meaningful in the present case because the appellant was represented by competent counsel throughout the dissolution and motions to modify, counsel very familiar with settlement agree ments and domestic relations law, and yet appellant persisted in using court enforcement methods for statutory alimony rather then the appropriate contract remedies. | 1 | 1980–1980 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.