Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Washington opinions name it 1 courts 2007–2021 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Washington courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
United Haulers Ass'n v. Oneida-Herkimer Solid Waste Management Authoritygreen2 sentences2015But Filo Foods does not argue, much less demonstrate, that the undisputed facts establish as a matter of law that “ ‘the burden imposed on [interstate] commerce is clearly excessive in relation to the putative local benefits.’ ” United Haulers Ass’n, 550 U.S. at 346 (alteration in original) (quoting Pike, 397 U.S. at 142 ). 2015But Filo Foods does not argue, much less demonstrate, that the undisputed facts establish as a matter of law that “ ‘the burden imposed on [interstate] commerce is clearly excessive in relation to the putative local benefits.’ ” United Haulers Ass’n, 550 U.S. at 346 (alteration in original) (quoting Pike, 397 U.S. at 142 ). | 3 | 3 |
State v. Heckelgreen2 sentences2007Id. at 838. 2007Id. at 838. | 1 | 2 |
Arlene Rosenblatt v. City of Santa Monicagreen2 sentences2021Rosenblatt v. City of Santa Monica, 940 F.3d 439, 452 (9th Cir. 2019), cert. denied, 140 S. Ct. 2762 (2020). 2021Rosenblatt v. City of Santa Monica, 940 F.3d 439, 452 (9th Cir. 2019), cert. denied, 140 S. Ct. 2762 (2020). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Pike v. Bruce Church, Inc.
green
2 sentences2015Under the Pike test, a nondiscriminatory state statute remains valid unless the burden it imposes on interstate commerce is “ ‘clearly excessive in relation to the putative local benefits.’ ” Id. (quoting Pike, 397 U.S. at 142 ). ¶57 Filo Foods contends that Proposition 1 discriminates on its face against interstate commerce. 2015Under the Pike test, a nondiscriminatory state statute remains valid unless the burden it imposes on interstate commerce is “ ‘clearly excessive in relation to the putative local benefits.’ ” Id. (quoting Pike, 397 U.S. at 142 ). ¶57 Filo Foods contends that Proposition 1 discriminates on its face against interstate commerce. | 3 | 2015–2015 |
Rosenblatt v. City of Santa Monica
neutral
2 sentences2021Rosenblatt v. City of Santa Monica, 940 F.3d 439, 452 (9th Cir. 2019), cert. denied, 140 S. Ct. 2762 (2020). 2021Rosenblatt v. City of Santa Monica, 940 F.3d 439, 452 (9th Cir. 2019), cert. denied, 140 S. Ct. 2762 (2020). | 1 | 2021–2021 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.