Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Washington opinions name it 2 courts 1995–2024 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Washington courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Robbinsgreen2 sentences2011See State v. Robbins, 138 Wn.2d 486, 492 , 980 P.2d 725 (1999); State v. Crediford, 130 Wn.2d 747, 755-56, 766 , 927 P.2d 1129 (1996). 2011See State v. Robbins, 138 Wash.2d 486, 492 , 980 P.2d 725 (1999); State v. Crediford, 130 Wash.2d 747, 755-56, 766 , 927 P.2d 1129 (1996). | 2 | 2 |
State v. Credifordgreen2 sentences2011See State v. Robbins, 138 Wn.2d 486, 492 , 980 P.2d 725 (1999); State v. Crediford, 130 Wn.2d 747, 755-56, 766 , 927 P.2d 1129 (1996). 2011See State v. Robbins, 138 Wash.2d 486, 492 , 980 P.2d 725 (1999); State v. Crediford, 130 Wash.2d 747, 755-56, 766 , 927 P.2d 1129 (1996). | 2 | 2 |
State v. Robbinsgreen2 sentences2011See State v. Robbins, 138 Wn.2d 486, 492 , 980 P.2d 725 (1999); State v. Crediford, 130 Wn.2d 747, 755-56, 766 , 927 P.2d 1129 (1996). 2011See State v. Robbins, 138 Wash.2d 486, 492 , 980 P.2d 725 (1999); State v. Crediford, 130 Wash.2d 747, 755-56, 766 , 927 P.2d 1129 (1996). | 2 | 2 |
State v. Smithgreen1 sentence1998See State v. Smith, 130 Wn.2d 215, 221-22 , 922 P.2d 811 (1996); WAC 448-13-020 (“the DataMaster is the only breath test instrument approved by the state toxicologist as a device for the measurement of alcohol in a person’s breath.”). 2 Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 , 86 S. Ct. 1602 , 16 L. | 1 | 1 |
State v. Smithgreen1 sentence1998See State v. Smith, 130 Wn.2d 215, 221-22 , 922 P.2d 811 (1996); WAC 448-13-020 (“the DataMaster is the only breath test instrument approved by the state toxicologist as a device for the measurement of alcohol in a person’s breath.”). 2 Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 , 86 S. Ct. 1602 , 16 L. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Crediford
green
2 sentences2011See State v. Robbins, 138 Wn.2d 486, 492 , 980 P.2d 725 (1999); State v. Crediford, 130 Wn.2d 747, 755-56, 766 , 927 P.2d 1129 (1996). 2011See State v. Robbins, 138 Wash.2d 486, 492 , 980 P.2d 725 (1999); State v. Crediford, 130 Wash.2d 747, 755-56, 766 , 927 P.2d 1129 (1996). | 2 | 2011–2011 |
Commonwealth v. Hourican
green
1 sentence2024Id. | 1 | 2024–2024 |
State v. Kennedy
green
2 sentences2020App. 2d 728 , 746, 440 P.3d 1032 (2019) (quoting State v. Kennedy, 107 Wn.2d 1, 6 , 726 P.2d 445 (1986)). 2020App. 2d 728 , 746, 440 P.3d 1032 (2019) (quoting State v. Kennedy, 107 Wn.2d 1, 6 , 726 P.2d 445 (1986)). | 1 | 2020–2020 |
State Of Washington v. Louis Earl Johnson, Jr.
green
1 sentence2020App. 2d 728 , 746, 440 P.3d 1032 (2019) (quoting State v. Kennedy, 107 Wn.2d 1, 6 , 726 P.2d 445 (1986)). | 1 | 2020–2020 |
Miranda v. Arizona
green
2 sentences1998See State v. Smith, 130 Wn.2d 215, 221-22 , 922 P.2d 811 (1996); WAC 448-13-020 (“the DataMaster is the only breath test instrument approved by the state toxicologist as a device for the measurement of alcohol in a person’s breath.”). 2 Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 , 86 S. Ct. 1602 , 16 L. 1998See State v. Smith, 130 Wn.2d 215, 221-22 , 922 P.2d 811 (1996); WAC 448-13-020 (“the DataMaster is the only breath test instrument approved by the state toxicologist as a device for the measurement of alcohol in a person’s breath.”). 2 Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 , 86 S. Ct. 1602 , 16 L. | 1 | 1998–1998 |
Bokor v. Department of Licensing
green
1 sentence1995"Probable cause for a warrantless arrest xists when facts and circumstances within the arresting fficer’s knowledge are sufficient to cause a person of reaonable caution to believe that a crime has been commit-ed.” Bokor v. Department of Licensing, 74 Wn. | 1 | 1995–1995 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.