Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Wisconsin opinions name it 2 courts 2005–2026 4 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Wisconsin courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Klessiggreen2 sentences2005While failure to provide this particular Klessig warning may form the basis for a reversal on direct appeal, see Klessig, 211 Wis. 2d at 206 , it cannot, under Tovar and *335 Hahn , form the basis of a collateral attack. 2005While failure to provide this particular Klessig warning may form the basis for a reversal on direct appeal, see Klessig, 211 Wis. 2d at 206 , it cannot, under Tovar and Hahn , form the basis of a collateral attack. | 2 | 3 |
Iowa v. Tovargreen2 sentences2026See Tovar, 541 U.S. at 81 (explaining that the constitutional requirement is satisfied when the defendant is informed “of the nature of the charges …, of [the defendant’s] right to be counseled regarding [the defendant’s] plea, and of the range of allowable punishments attendant upon the entry of a guilty plea”).7 ¶54 Christianson argues that the State did not present sufficient evidence to show that Christianson had the requisite understanding of each of the Klessig factors. 2026See Tovar, 541 U.S. at 81 (explaining that the constitutional requirement is satisfied when the defendant is informed “of the nature of the charges …, of [the defendant’s] right to be counseled regarding [the defendant’s] plea, and of the range of allowable punishments attendant upon the entry of a guilty plea”).7 ¶54 Christianson argues that the State did not present sufficient evidence to show that Christianson had the requisite understanding of each of the Klessig factors. | 1 | 1 |
State v. Imanigreen2 sentences2022See id., 211 Wis. 2d at 206 . ¶18 Furthermore, after admitting to making some obstructionist comments during the colloquy, Davis stated that he did not want to pursue proceeding pro se. 2022See id., 211 Wis. 2d at 206 . ¶18 Furthermore, after admitting to making some obstructionist comments during the colloquy, Davis stated that he did not want to pursue proceeding pro se. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Wisconsin. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Ernst
green
1 sentence2026Instead, he “simply relied on the transcript and asserted that the court’s colloquy was not sufficient” “because the [c]ourt did not address each of the four Klessig factors.” Id. | 1 | 2026–2026 |
State v. Weed
green
2 sentences2010State v. Weed, 2003 WI 85, ¶ 39 , 263 Wis. 2d 434 , 666 N.W.2d 485 . ¶ 35. 2010State v. Weed, 2003 WI 85, ¶ 39 , 263 Wis. 2d 434 , 666 N.W.2d 485 . ¶ 35. | 1 | 2010–2010 |
State v. Ndina
green
2 sentences2010State v. Weed, 2003 WI 85, ¶ 39 , 263 Wis.2d 434 , 666 N.W.2d 485 . ¶ 35 We recently discussed common law waiver in State v. Ndina, 2009 WI 21 , 315 Wis.2d 653 , 761 N.W.2d 612 . 2010State v. Weed, 2003 WI 85, ¶ 39 , 263 Wis.2d 434 , 666 N.W.2d 485 . ¶ 35 We recently discussed common law waiver in State v. Ndina, 2009 WI 21 , 315 Wis.2d 653 , 761 N.W.2d 612 . | 1 | 2010–2010 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.