Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Wisconsin opinions name it 2 courts 2000–2026 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Wisconsin courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. JEREMIAH C.green2 sentences2026Id., ¶15; see also State v. Jeremiah C., 2003 WI App 40, ¶17 , 260 Wis. 2d 359 , 659 N.W.2d 193 (explaining that the Related-Statutes canon “refers to statutes and regulations relating to the same subject matter or having a common purpose” and that “[t]he statutory construction doctrine of in pari materia requires a court to read, apply and construe statutes relating to the same subject matter together”). 2026Id., ¶15; see also State v. Jeremiah C., 2003 WI App 40, ¶17 , 260 Wis. 2d 359 , 659 N.W.2d 193 (explaining that the Related-Statutes canon “refers to statutes and regulations relating to the same subject matter or having a common purpose” and that “[t]he statutory construction doctrine of in pari materia requires a court to read, apply and construe statutes relating to the same subject matter together”). | 2 | 3 |
State v. Petersgreen2 sentences2025See State v. Peters, 2003 WI 88, ¶14 , 263 Wis. 2d 475 , 665 N.W.2d 171 . 10 No. 2024AP2291-CR ¶22 First, the State cites the related-statutes canon of construction, which provides that “statutes in the same chapter ‘contain[ing] the same subject matter … must be considered in pari materia and construed together.’” See James v. Heinrich, 2021 WI 58 , ¶19, 397 Wis. 2d 517 , 960 N.W.2d 350 (citation omitted); see also State v. Jeremiah C., 2003 WI App 40, ¶17 , 260 Wis. 2d 359 , 659 N.W.2d 193 (explaining that in pari materia “refers to statutes and regulations relating to the same subject matte 2025See State v. Peters, 2003 WI 88, ¶14 , 263 Wis. 2d 475 , 665 N.W.2d 171 . 10 No. 2024AP2291-CR ¶22 First, the State cites the related-statutes canon of construction, which provides that “statutes in the same chapter ‘contain[ing] the same subject matter … must be considered in pari materia and construed together.’” See James v. Heinrich, 2021 WI 58 , ¶19, 397 Wis. 2d 517 , 960 N.W.2d 350 (citation omitted); see also State v. Jeremiah C., 2003 WI App 40, ¶17 , 260 Wis. 2d 359 , 659 N.W.2d 193 (explaining that in pari materia “refers to statutes and regulations relating to the same subject matte | 1 | 1 |
State v. Corey T. Rectorgreen2 sentences2025See State v. Peters, 2003 WI 88, ¶14 , 263 Wis. 2d 475 , 665 N.W.2d 171 . 10 No. 2024AP2291-CR ¶22 First, the State cites the related-statutes canon of construction, which provides that “statutes in the same chapter ‘contain[ing] the same subject matter … must be considered in pari materia and construed together.’” See James v. Heinrich, 2021 WI 58 , ¶19, 397 Wis. 2d 517 , 960 N.W.2d 350 (citation omitted); see also State v. Jeremiah C., 2003 WI App 40, ¶17 , 260 Wis. 2d 359 , 659 N.W.2d 193 (explaining that in pari materia “refers to statutes and regulations relating to the same subject matte 2025The prior-construction canon “is at its strongest when the court is interpreting a reenactment of the same statute,” but “it has also been applied to interpretations of related statutes.” Id. | 1 | 1 |
WCRIS v. Janel Heinrichgreen1 sentence2025See State v. Peters, 2003 WI 88, ¶14 , 263 Wis. 2d 475 , 665 N.W.2d 171 . 10 No. 2024AP2291-CR ¶22 First, the State cites the related-statutes canon of construction, which provides that “statutes in the same chapter ‘contain[ing] the same subject matter … must be considered in pari materia and construed together.’” See James v. Heinrich, 2021 WI 58 , ¶19, 397 Wis. 2d 517 , 960 N.W.2d 350 (citation omitted); see also State v. Jeremiah C., 2003 WI App 40, ¶17 , 260 Wis. 2d 359 , 659 N.W.2d 193 (explaining that in pari materia “refers to statutes and regulations relating to the same subject matte | 1 | 1 |
Beard v. Lee Enterprises, Inc.green1 sentence2000See id. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Wisconsin. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Winebow, Inc. v. Capitol-Husting Co., Inc.
green
2 sentences2020Hummingbird has conceded that it has not established standing based on any allegation that the use variance violates the City’s comprehensive plan ¶18 Hummingbird also argues as an independent basis for standing based on its claim that BOZA’s grant of the use variance violates the City’s 5 Acquisition B relies on the “in pari materia rule.” “The statutory construction doctrine of in pari materia requires a court to read, apply, and construe statutes relating to the same subject matter together.” Winebow, Inc. v. Capitol-Husting Co., Inc., 2018 WI 60 , ¶30 n.6, 381 Wis. 2d 732 , 914 N.W.2d 631 2020Hummingbird has conceded that it has not established standing based on any allegation that the use variance violates the City’s comprehensive plan ¶18 Hummingbird also argues as an independent basis for standing based on its claim that BOZA’s grant of the use variance violates the City’s 5 Acquisition B relies on the “in pari materia rule.” “The statutory construction doctrine of in pari materia requires a court to read, apply, and construe statutes relating to the same subject matter together.” Winebow, Inc. v. Capitol-Husting Co., Inc., 2018 WI 60 , ¶30 n.6, 381 Wis. 2d 732 , 914 N.W.2d 631 | 1 | 2020–2020 |
Perra v. Menomonee Mutual Insurance
neutral
1 sentence2003Id. | 1 | 2003–2003 |