Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Wisconsin opinions name it 2 courts 1997–2024 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Wisconsin courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Culbert v. Ciresigreen2 sentences2024“Whether to apply estoppel to preclude a party from raising a defense is within the [circuit] court’s discretion.” Culbert v. Ciresi, 2003 WI App 158, ¶15 , 266 Wis. 2d 189 , 667 N.W.2d 825 . 8 “Equitable estoppel has four elements: ‘(1) action or non-action, (2) on the part of one against whom estoppel is asserted, (3) which induces reasonable reliance thereon by the other, either in action or non-action, and (4) which is to his or her detriment.’” Nugent v. Slaght, 2001 WI App 282, ¶29 , 249 Wis. 2d 220 , 638 N.W.2d 594 (citation omitted). 18 No. 2023AP1309 ¶38 The circuit court, relying on 2024“Whether to apply estoppel to preclude a party from raising a defense is within the [circuit] court’s discretion.” Culbert v. Ciresi, 2003 WI App 158, ¶15 , 266 Wis. 2d 189 , 667 N.W.2d 825 . 8 “Equitable estoppel has four elements: ‘(1) action or non-action, (2) on the part of one against whom estoppel is asserted, (3) which induces reasonable reliance thereon by the other, either in action or non-action, and (4) which is to his or her detriment.’” Nugent v. Slaght, 2001 WI App 282, ¶29 , 249 Wis. 2d 220 , 638 N.W.2d 594 (citation omitted). 18 No. 2023AP1309 ¶38 The circuit court, relying on | 2 | 3 |
Prince v. Bryantgreen2 sentences2020See Culbert v. Ciresi, 2003 WI App 158, ¶16 , 266 Wis. 2d 189 , 667 N.W.2d 825 ("Whether to apply estoppel to preclude a party from raising a defense is within the trial court's discretion."); see also Prince v. Bryant, 87 Wis. 2d 662, 674 , 275 N.W.2d 676 (1979) (emphasizing that a circuit court has the power to apply an equitable remedy as necessary to meet the needs of a case). ¶43 We conclude that the circuit court applied an improper legal standard when it determined that Wis. Stat. § 109.03 (5), which outlines the right of an employee to bring a wage claim, acted as a complete bar to JDF 2020See Culbert v. Ciresi, 2003 WI App 158, ¶16 , 266 Wis. 2d 189 , 667 N.W.2d 825 ("Whether to apply estoppel to preclude a party from raising a defense is within the trial court's discretion."); see also Prince v. Bryant, 87 Wis. 2d 662, 674 , 275 N.W.2d 676 (1979) (emphasizing that a circuit court has the power to apply an equitable remedy as necessary to meet the needs of a case). ¶43 We conclude that the circuit court applied an improper legal standard when it determined that Wis. Stat. § 109.03 (5), which outlines the right of an employee to bring a wage claim, acted as a complete bar to JDF | 2 | 2 |
Gonzalez v. Teskeygreen2 sentences2004Gonzalez v. Teskey, 160 Wis. 2d 1, 13 , 465 N.W.2d 525 (Ct. App. 1990). 2004Gonzalez v. Teskey, 160 Wis. 2d 1, 13 , 465 N.W.2d 525 (Ct. App. 1990). | 1 | 3 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Wisconsin. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Nugent v. Slaght
green
2 sentences2024“Whether to apply estoppel to preclude a party from raising a defense is within the [circuit] court’s discretion.” Culbert v. Ciresi, 2003 WI App 158, ¶15 , 266 Wis. 2d 189 , 667 N.W.2d 825 . 8 “Equitable estoppel has four elements: ‘(1) action or non-action, (2) on the part of one against whom estoppel is asserted, (3) which induces reasonable reliance thereon by the other, either in action or non-action, and (4) which is to his or her detriment.’” Nugent v. Slaght, 2001 WI App 282, ¶29 , 249 Wis. 2d 220 , 638 N.W.2d 594 (citation omitted). 18 No. 2023AP1309 ¶38 The circuit court, relying on 2024“Whether to apply estoppel to preclude a party from raising a defense is within the [circuit] court’s discretion.” Culbert v. Ciresi, 2003 WI App 158, ¶15 , 266 Wis. 2d 189 , 667 N.W.2d 825 . 8 “Equitable estoppel has four elements: ‘(1) action or non-action, (2) on the part of one against whom estoppel is asserted, (3) which induces reasonable reliance thereon by the other, either in action or non-action, and (4) which is to his or her detriment.’” Nugent v. Slaght, 2001 WI App 282, ¶29 , 249 Wis. 2d 220 , 638 N.W.2d 594 (citation omitted). 18 No. 2023AP1309 ¶38 The circuit court, relying on | 1 | 2024–2024 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.