Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Wisconsin opinions name it 2 courts 1990–2008 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Wisconsin courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Estate of Szleszinski Ex Rel. Szleszinski v. Labor & Industry Review Commissiongreen2 sentences2007Szleszinski, 287 Wis.2d 775, ¶¶ 17-18, 21 , 706 N.W.2d 345 . 2007Szleszinski, 287 Wis.2d 775, ¶¶ 17-18, 21 , 706 N.W.2d 345 . | 1 | 1 |
Bunker v. Labor & Industry Review Commissiongreen2 sentences2004See Keup v. DHFS, 2004 WI 16, ¶ 16 , 269 Wis. 2d 59 , 675 N.W.2d 755 ; see also Bunker v. LIRC, 2002 WI App 216, ¶ 16 , 257 Wis. 2d 255 , 650 N.W.2d 864 (taking up and deciding a legal issue that LIRC did not address). ¶ 51. 2004See Keup v. DHFS, 2004 WI 16, ¶ 16 , 269 Wis. 2d 59 , 675 N.W.2d 755 ; see also Bunker v. LIRC, 2002 WI App 216, ¶ 16 , 257 Wis. 2d 255 , 650 N.W.2d 864 (taking up and deciding a legal issue that LIRC did not address). ¶ 51. | 1 | 1 |
Keup v. Wisconsin Department of Health & Family Servicesgreen2 sentences2004See Keup v. DHFS, 2004 WI 16, ¶ 16 , 269 Wis. 2d 59 , 675 N.W.2d 755 ; see also Bunker v. LIRC, 2002 WI App 216, ¶ 16 , 257 Wis. 2d 255 , 650 N.W.2d 864 (taking up and deciding a legal issue that LIRC did not address). ¶ 51. 2004See Keup v. DHFS, 2004 WI 16, ¶ 16 , 269 Wis. 2d 59 , 675 N.W.2d 755 ; see also Bunker v. LIRC, 2002 WI App 216, ¶ 16 , 257 Wis. 2d 255 , 650 N.W.2d 864 (taking up and deciding a legal issue that LIRC did not address). ¶ 51. | 1 | 1 |
Watkins v. Labor & Industry Review Commissiongreen1 sentence1997The court has stated that the WFEA "evinces a legislative intent that DILHR have authority to fashion an appropriate remedy for a victim of discrimination that comports with the purposes of the Act." Watkins, 117 Wis. 2d at 763-64 (attorney fees available under WFEA claim). | 1 | 1 |
State Ex Rel. Flowers v. Department of Health & Social Servicesgreen2 sentences1993Flowers v. DHSS, 81 Wis. 2d 376, 387 , 260 N.W.2d 727, 734 (1978), stated that collateral estoppel applies where the matter raised in the second suit is identical in all respects to that decided in the first proceeding and where the controlling facts and applicable legal rules remain unchanged. 1993Flowers v. DHSS, 81 Wis. 2d 376, 387 , 260 N.W.2d 727, 734 (1978), stated that collateral estoppel applies where the matter raised in the second suit is identical in all respects to that decided in the first proceeding and where the controlling facts and applicable legal rules remain unchanged. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Wisconsin. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Tana J. Waid v. Merrill Area Public Schools, Dr. Strand Wedul and James Boettcher
green
2 sentences2008Waid, 91 F.3d at 866 . ¶ 10. 2008Waid, 91 F.3d at 866 . ¶ 10. | 1 | 2008–2008 |
City of La Crosse Police & Fire Commission v. Labor & Industry Review Commission
green
2 sentences2004City of La Crosse Police & Fire Comm'n, 139 Wis. 2d at 760 . (2) The employee must prove an accommodation exists, that the accommodation is reasonable, but notwithstanding that reasonable accommodation, the employer refused employment. 2004City of La Crosse Police & Fire Comm'n, 139 Wis. 2d at 760 . (2) The employee must prove an accommodation exists, that the accommodation is reasonable, but notwithstanding that reasonable accommodation, the employer refused employment. | 1 | 2004–2004 |
Norris v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human Relations
green
2 sentences1997In Norris, 155 Wis. 2d 337 , the court of appeals allowed an employe to bring a WFEA claim for handicap discrimination based on a refusal to rehire. 1997In Norris, 155 Wis. 2d 337 , the court of appeals allowed an employe to bring a WFEA claim for handicap discrimination based on a refusal to rehire. | 1 | 1997–1997 |
Yanta v. Montgomery Ward & Co., Inc.
green
2 sentences1990In Yanta v. Montgomery Ward & Co., 66 Wis. 2d 53 , 224 N.W.2d 389 (1974), the court held that a plaintiff could not seek tort damages for mental anguish arising out of her WFEA claim for employment discrimination based on sex. 1990In Yanta v. Montgomery Ward & Co., 66 Wis. 2d 53 , 224 N.W.2d 389 (1974), the court held that a plaintiff could not seek tort damages for mental anguish arising out of her WFEA claim for employment discrimination based on sex. | 1 | 1990–1990 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.