Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Wisconsin opinions name it 2 courts 1973–2011 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Wisconsin courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Estate of Hegarty v. Beauchainegreen2 sentences2011To conclude otherwise would "entirely defeat[] the very purpose of the witness list requirement." See Estate of Hegarty v. Beauchaine, 2006 WI App 248, ¶ 188 , 297 Wis. 2d 70 , 727 N.W.2d 857 . ¶ 63. 2011To conclude otherwise would "entirely defeat[] the very purpose of the witness list requirement." See Estate of Hegarty v. Beauchaine, 2006 WI App 248, ¶ 188 , 297 Wis. 2d 70 , 727 N.W.2d 857 . ¶ 63. | 1 | 2 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Wisconsin. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Gallegos v. State
green
2 sentences1978App.2d 102 , 259 N.E.2d 357 (1970); Gallegos v. State, 84 Nev. 608 , 446 Pac.2d 656 (1968), or by recessing for a period sufficient to allow counsel to interview the witness .... 1978App.2d 102 , 259 N.E.2d 357 (1970); Gallegos v. State, 84 Nev. 608 , 446 Pac.2d 656 (1968), or by recessing for a period sufficient to allow counsel to interview the witness .... | 3 | 1973–1978 |
People v. White
neutral
2 sentences1978The court may in appropriate cases grant the opposing party a recess or a continuance.” “We point out when an error is claimed amounting to noncompliance with or abuse of the witness-list requirement, the error or abuse may in some cases be cured by the court granting the other party a continuance so he can adequately prepare for trial, People v. White, 123 Ill. 1975We point out when an error is claimed amounting to noncompliance with or abuse of the witness-list requirement, the error or abuse may in some cases be cured by the court granting the other party a continuance so he can adequately prepare for trial, People v. White (1970), 123 Ill. | 3 | 1973–1978 |
Tucker v. State
green
2 sentences1984This court has stated that “when an error is claimed amounting to noncompliance with or abuse of the witness-list requirement [under sec. 971.23(1)], the error or abuse may in some cases be cured by the court granting the other party a continuance so he can adequately prepare for trial.” Tucker v. State, 84 Wis. 2d 630, 640 , 267 N.W.2d 630 (1978); (quoting Irby v. State, 60 Wis. 2d 311, 321 , 210 N.W.2d 755 (1973)). 1984This court has stated that “when an error is claimed amounting to noncompliance with or abuse of the witness-list requirement [under sec. 971.23(1)], the error or abuse may in some cases be cured by the court granting the other party a continuance so he can adequately prepare for trial.” Tucker v. State, 84 Wis. 2d 630, 640 , 267 N.W.2d 630 (1978); (quoting Irby v. State, 60 Wis. 2d 311, 321 , 210 N.W.2d 755 (1973)). | 1 | 1984–1984 |
Irby v. State
green
2 sentences1984This court has stated that “when an error is claimed amounting to noncompliance with or abuse of the witness-list requirement [under sec. 971.23(1)], the error or abuse may in some cases be cured by the court granting the other party a continuance so he can adequately prepare for trial.” Tucker v. State, 84 Wis. 2d 630, 640 , 267 N.W.2d 630 (1978); (quoting Irby v. State, 60 Wis. 2d 311, 321 , 210 N.W.2d 755 (1973)). 1984This court has stated that “when an error is claimed amounting to noncompliance with or abuse of the witness-list requirement [under sec. 971.23(1)], the error or abuse may in some cases be cured by the court granting the other party a continuance so he can adequately prepare for trial.” Tucker v. State, 84 Wis. 2d 630, 640 , 267 N.W.2d 630 (1978); (quoting Irby v. State, 60 Wis. 2d 311, 321 , 210 N.W.2d 755 (1973)). | 1 | 1984–1984 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.