6 West Virginia opinions name it 1 courts 1983–2019 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by West Virginia courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Automotriz Del Golfo De California v. Resnickgreen2 sentences1986See, e.g., Automotriz Del Golfo De California v. Resnick, 47 Cal.2d 792, 796 , 306 P.2d 1, 3 (1957) (en banc). 5 Most of the numerous factors listed previously are pertinent primarily to the disregard of formalities requirement, not because it is the more important requirement — it is not — but because it is easier to compile a list of typical corporate formalities than to anticipate and list types of inequitable and unfair consequences which could result from not piercing the corporate veil in a given case. 6 In a breach of contract case many of the commentators and a few of the cases suggest 1986See, e.g., Automotriz Del Golfo De California v. Resnick, 47 Cal.2d 792, 796 , 306 P.2d 1, 3 (1957) (en banc). 5 Most of the numerous factors listed previously are pertinent primarily to the disregard of formalities requirement, not because it is the more important requirement — it is not — but because it is easier to compile a list of typical corporate formalities than to anticipate and list types of inequitable and unfair consequences which could result from not piercing the corporate veil in a given case. 6 In a breach of contract case many of the commentators and a few of the cases suggest | 1 | 1 |
Brandywine-Main Line Radio, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission, Greater Philadelphia Council of Churches, Intervenorsgreen1 sentence1983Brandywine-Main Line Radio, Inc. v. F.C.C., 473 F.2d 16, 38-39 (D.C.Cir.1972). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in West Virginia. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Laya v. Erin Homes, Inc.
green
2 sentences2019As set forth in syllabus points six and seven, respectively, of Kubican , there is a "disregard of the formalities requirement" and a "fairness requirement": "[T]o 'pierce the corporate veil' in order to hold the shareholder(s) actively participating in the operation of the business personally liable ..., there is normally a two-prong test: (1) there must be such unity of interest and ownership that the separate personalities of the corporation and of the individual shareholder(s) no longer exist (a disregard of formalities requirement) and (2) an inequitable result would occur if the acts are 2019As set forth in syllabus points six and seven, respectively, of Kubican , there is a "disregard of the formalities requirement" and a "fairness requirement": "[T]o 'pierce the corporate veil' in order to hold the shareholder(s) actively participating in the operation of the business personally liable ..., there is normally a two-prong test: (1) there must be such unity of interest and ownership that the separate personalities of the corporation and of the individual shareholder(s) no longer exist (a disregard of formalities requirement) and (2) an inequitable result would occur if the acts are | 3 | 2008–2019 |
Red Lion Broadcasting Co. v. Federal Communications Commission
green
2 sentences1985This is known as the fairness doctrine....” 395 U.S. at 369 , 89 S.Ct. at 1796 , 23 L.Ed.2d at 377 . 13 . 1985This is known as the fairness doctrine....” 395 U.S. at 369 , 89 S.Ct. at 1796 , 23 L.Ed.2d at 377 . 13 . | 1 | 1985–1985 |
Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc. v. Democratic National Committee
green
2 sentences1983The fairness doctrine “imposes two affirmative responsibilities on the broadcaster: coverage of issues of public importance must be adequate and must fairly reflect differing viewpoints.” Columbia Broadcasting System, 412 U.S. at 111 , 93 S.Ct. at 2090 , 36 L.Ed.2d at 788 . 1983The fairness doctrine “imposes two affirmative responsibilities on the broadcaster: coverage of issues of public importance must be adequate and must fairly reflect differing viewpoints.” Columbia Broadcasting System, 412 U.S. at 111 , 93 S.Ct. at 2090 , 36 L.Ed.2d at 788 . | 1 | 1983–1983 |
cluster 298615
green
1 sentence1983Green v. FCC, 447 F.2d 323 (D.C.Cir.1971). | 1 | 1983–1983 |
Dorothy Healey v. Federal Communications Commission and United States of America, Metromedia, Inc., Intervenor
green
1 sentence1983Healy v. FCC, 460 F.2d 917 (D.C.Cir.1972). | 1 | 1983–1983 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.