Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Alabama opinions name it 2 courts 1926–1952 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Alabama courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Varner v. Hardygreen2 sentences1952See Varner v. Hardy, 209 Ala. 575 , 96 So. 860 ; Maxwell and Delehomme v. Moore, 163 Ala. 490 , 50 So. 882 . 1952See Varner v. Hardy, 209 Ala. 575 , 96 So. 860 ; Maxwell and Delehomme v. Moore, 163 Ala. 490 , 50 So. 882 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Alabama. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Maxwell & Delehomme v. Moore
neutral
2 sentences1952See Varner v. Hardy, 209 Ala. 575 , 96 So. 860 ; Maxwell and Delehomme v. Moore, 163 Ala. 490 , 50 So. 882 . 1952See Varner v. Hardy, 209 Ala. 575 , 96 So. 860 ; Maxwell and Delehomme v. Moore, 163 Ala. 490 , 50 So. 882 . | 1 | 1952–1952 |
Department of Industrial Relations v. Pesnell
green
2 sentences1942Appellant insists that this case is ruled by the Drummond case, Department of Industrial Relations v. Drummond, Ala.App., 1 So.2d 395 , 398 , 1 certiorari denied 241 Ala. 142 , 1 So.2d 402 , wherein this court said: "The Legislature never intended that one, who has purchased his protection against involuntary unemployment, should be denied those benefits because of a 'labor dispute' in which he was in no way involved and the causes of which unemployment he, his agents or organization were powerless to avert." Appellee insists that the case is within the rule laid down in the Pesnell case, Depa 1942Appellant insists that this case is ruled by the Drummond case, Department of Industrial Relations v. Drummond, Ala.App., 1 So.2d 395 , 398 , 1 certiorari denied 241 Ala. 142 , 1 So.2d 402 , wherein this court said: "The Legislature never intended that one, who has purchased his protection against involuntary unemployment, should be denied those benefits because of a 'labor dispute' in which he was in no way involved and the causes of which unemployment he, his agents or organization were powerless to avert." Appellee insists that the case is within the rule laid down in the Pesnell case, Depa | 1 | 1942–1942 |
Riner v. State
green
1 sentence1942Appellant insists that this case is ruled by the Drummond case, Department of Industrial Relations v. Drummond, Ala.App., 1 So.2d 395 , 398 , 1 certiorari denied 241 Ala. 142 , 1 So.2d 402 , wherein this court said: "The Legislature never intended that one, who has purchased his protection against involuntary unemployment, should be denied those benefits because of a 'labor dispute' in which he was in no way involved and the causes of which unemployment he, his agents or organization were powerless to avert." Appellee insists that the case is within the rule laid down in the Pesnell case, Depa | 1 | 1942–1942 |
Department of Industrial Relations v. Drummond
green
1 sentence1942Appellant insists that this case is ruled by the Drummond case, Department of Industrial Relations v. Drummond, Ala.App., 1 So.2d 395 , 398 , 1 certiorari denied 241 Ala. 142 , 1 So.2d 402 , wherein this court said: "The Legislature never intended that one, who has purchased his protection against involuntary unemployment, should be denied those benefits because of a 'labor dispute' in which he was in no way involved and the causes of which unemployment he, his agents or organization were powerless to avert." Appellee insists that the case is within the rule laid down in the Pesnell case, Depa | 1 | 1942–1942 |
Bowles v. State
green
1 sentence1942Appellant insists that this case is ruled by the Drummond case, Department of Industrial Relations v. Drummond, Ala.App., 1 So.2d 395 , 398 , 1 certiorari denied 241 Ala. 142 , 1 So.2d 402 , wherein this court said: "The Legislature never intended that one, who has purchased his protection against involuntary unemployment, should be denied those benefits because of a 'labor dispute' in which he was in no way involved and the causes of which unemployment he, his agents or organization were powerless to avert." Appellee insists that the case is within the rule laid down in the Pesnell case, Depa | 1 | 1942–1942 |
College Court Realty Co. v. J. C. Letcher Lumber Co.
neutral
2 sentences1933This case is within the rule of College Court Realty Co. v. Letcher Lumber Co., 201 Ala. 362, 363 , 78 So. 218, 219 , saying; “While it is true that the record does not show a contract specific in terms as to how much lumber was to be used on any particular lot or house, it does show that all the lumber was to be used, and was used on several lots of defendant’s, and went into several houses' thereon; and the evidence, we hold, sufficiently shows how much was used in each particular building, to meet the requirements of our statute as heretofore construed by us. 1933This case is within the rule of College Court Realty Co. v. Letcher Lumber Co., 201 Ala. 362, 363 , 78 So. 218, 219 , saying; “While it is true that the record does not show a contract specific in terms as to how much lumber was to be used on any particular lot or house, it does show that all the lumber was to be used, and was used on several lots of defendant’s, and went into several houses' thereon; and the evidence, we hold, sufficiently shows how much was used in each particular building, to meet the requirements of our statute as heretofore construed by us. | 1 | 1933–1933 |
City of Birmingham v. Louisville N. R. Co.
green
1 sentence1927Co. (Ala. Sup.) 112 So. 742 . 2 This case is within that rule, and the sustaining of demurrer to the bill as a whole and dismissing the same will be tested by the question of equity vel non as to any aspect presented. | 1 | 1927–1927 |
Gibbs & Sterrett Manufacturing Co. v. Brucker
green
2 sentences1926This case is within the principle determined in Gibbs v. Bruckner, 4 S. Ct. 572 , 111 U. S. 597 , 28 L. 1926This case is within the principle determined in Gibbs v. Bruckner, 4 S. Ct. 572 , 111 U. S. 597 , 28 L. | 1 | 1926–1926 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.