controversy bar (Alabama) · Go Syfert
← Alabama issues

controversy bar in Alabama

5 Alabama opinions name it 1 courts 1909–1997 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Alabama courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (1)

CaseFollowedCited
Thompson v. Hartford Acc. & Indem. Co.green
ala · 1984 · cited in 2 Alabama opinions naming this issue, 1997–1997
2 sentences

1997Co., 460 So.2d 1264, 1266 (Ala.1984).

1997Co., 460 So.2d 1264, 1266 (Ala.1984).

22

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Alabama. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (5)

CaseCitedYears
Groves v. Sentell green
scotus · 1894
2 sentences

1928In Wheeler v. Armstrong, 164 Ala. 442 , 453 , 51 So. 268 , 271 , the difference between a bill of interpleader and the remedy known as a bill in the nature of a bill of interpleader is remarked, and the latter as being proper and "in which a complainant may also seek relief," and that the fact that he "claims some substantial interest or right in the controversy does not bar him of his right to the remedy of interpleader. " Groves v. Sentell, 153 U.S. 465 , 14 S.Ct. 898 , 38 L.Ed. 785 .

1928In Wheeler v. Armstrong, 164 Ala. 442 , 453 , 51 So. 268 , 271 , the difference between a bill of interpleader and the remedy known as a bill in the nature of a bill of interpleader is remarked, and the latter as being proper and "in which a complainant may also seek relief," and that the fact that he "claims some substantial interest or right in the controversy does not bar him of his right to the remedy of interpleader. " Groves v. Sentell, 153 U.S. 465 , 14 S.Ct. 898 , 38 L.Ed. 785 .

21909–1928
Croft v. Croft green
ala · 1929
2 sentences

1945Code 1940, Tit. 7, § 433. *295 In Croft v. Croft et al., 219 Ala. 94 , 121 So. 82 , the witness Mrs. Boram was not a party to the controversy and had no claim against the estate.

1945Code 1940, Tit. 7, § 433. *295 In Croft v. Croft et al., 219 Ala. 94 , 121 So. 82 , the witness Mrs. Boram was not a party to the controversy and had no claim against the estate.

11945–1945
Moore v. Robinson neutral
ala · 1926
2 sentences

1945In Moore v. Robinson, 214 Ala. 412 , 108 So. 233 , the wife of the claimant, who had been improperly joined as a party, was withdrawn, and this withdrawal rendered her a competent witness to support the claim of the husband.

1945In Moore v. Robinson, 214 Ala. 412 , 108 So. 233 , the wife of the claimant, who had been improperly joined as a party, was withdrawn, and this withdrawal rendered her a competent witness to support the claim of the husband.

11945–1945
Wheeler v. Armstrong green
ala · 1909
2 sentences

1928In Wheeler v. Armstrong, 164 Ala. 442 , 453 , 51 So. 268 , 271 , the difference between a bill of interpleader and the remedy known as a bill in the nature of a bill of interpleader is remarked, and the latter as being proper and "in which a complainant may also seek relief," and that the fact that he "claims some substantial interest or right in the controversy does not bar him of his right to the remedy of interpleader. " Groves v. Sentell, 153 U.S. 465 , 14 S.Ct. 898 , 38 L.Ed. 785 .

1928In Wheeler v. Armstrong, 164 Ala. 442 , 453 , 51 So. 268 , 271 , the difference between a bill of interpleader and the remedy known as a bill in the nature of a bill of interpleader is remarked, and the latter as being proper and "in which a complainant may also seek relief," and that the fact that he "claims some substantial interest or right in the controversy does not bar him of his right to the remedy of interpleader. " Groves v. Sentell, 153 U.S. 465 , 14 S.Ct. 898 , 38 L.Ed. 785 .

11928–1928
Johnson v. Blackmon green
ala · 1918
2 sentences

1928The cases of Johnson v. Blackmon, 201 Ala. 537 , 78 So. 891 , and Marsh v. Mut.

1928The cases of Johnson v. Blackmon, 201 Ala. 537 , 78 So. 891 , and Marsh v. Mut.

11928–1928

Where else courts name it

NJ 361 (1967–2026) DE 47 (1952–2026) WI 38 (1953–2026) TX 30 (1880–2022) IL 25 (1913–2025) CA 21 (1895–2025) OK 16 (1940–2024) MI 14 (1932–2018) NV 12 (1948–2022) AR 11 (1947–2016) NY 11 (1873–2025) FL 8 (1957–2024) ND 7 (1948–2017) VA 7 (2007–2024) IA 6 (1916–1978) NC 6 (1984–2013) WA 6 (1903–2018) MA 6 (1943–2014) NM 6 (1978–2022) LA 5 (1946–2019) MD 5 (2004–2025) OR 5 (1908–2000) AL 5 (1909–1997) SD 5 (1995–2025) WV 5 (1945–2014) IN 4 (2000–2008) OH 3 (1978–2004) PA 3 (1953–2018) UT 3 (1996–2020) GA 3 (1925–2019) RI 3 (1992–2007) WY 2 (2005–2019) NH 2 (1841–2019) MS 2 (2001–2003) ME 2 (2004–2017) TN 2 (1946–1968) CO 2 (1942–1960) KS 2 (1915–1991) AZ 2 (1988–1989)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check