Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Alabama opinions name it 2 courts 1976–2008 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Alabama courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Gregath v. Batesgreen2 sentences2008The Supreme Court stated: “In Gregath v. Bates, 359 So.2d 404 (AJa.Civ.App.1978), Holmes, J., writing for the court, specifically addressed the same question now pending before us: “ ‘The defendant alleges as error the trial court’s refusal to admit testimony which attempted to impeach a witness. 1991See 3 A.L.R.3d 965 , and the cases cited therein, concerning lack of documentary proof of a prior felony conviction.' "In Gregath v. Bates , 359 So.2d 404 (Ala.Civ.App. 1978), Holmes, J., writing for the court, specifically addressed the same question now pending before us: " 'The defendant alleges as error the trial court's refusal to admit testimony which attempted to impeach a witness. | 2 | 3 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Alabama. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Batson v. Kentucky
green
2 sentences1990II The defendant alleges a violation of Batson v. Kentucky , 476 U.S. 79 , 106 S.Ct. 1712 , 90 L.Ed.2d 69 (1986). 1990II The defendant alleges a violation of Batson v. Kentucky , 476 U.S. 79 , 106 S.Ct. 1712 , 90 L.Ed.2d 69 (1986). | 1 | 1990–1990 |
Lambert v. State
green
2 sentences1976On preliminary examination, we granted his petition for certiorari in which he alleges that the decision of the Court of Criminal Appeals conflicts with Lambert v. State , 208 Ala. 42 , 93 So. 708 (1922); The portion of the record in which the defendant alleges error is as follows: "THE COURT: All right. 1976On preliminary examination, we granted his petition for certiorari in which he alleges that the decision of the Court of Criminal Appeals conflicts with Lambert v. State , 208 Ala. 42 , 93 So. 708 (1922); The portion of the record in which the defendant alleges error is as follows: "THE COURT: All right. | 1 | 1976–1976 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.