defendant alleges error (Washington) · Go Syfert
← Washington issues

defendant alleges error in Washington

8 Washington opinions name it 2 courts 1997–2025 2 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Washington courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (1)

CaseFollowedCited
State v. Eastergreen
wash · 1996 · cited in 2 Washington opinions naming this issue, 2002–2002
2 sentences

2002See, e.g., State v. Easter, 130 Wn.2d 228, 234-42 , 922 P.2d 1285 (1996).

2002See, e.g., State v. Easter, 130 Wn.2d 228, 234-42 , 922 P.2d 1285 (1996).

22

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (7)

CaseCitedYears
State v. Willis green
wash · 2005
2 sentences

2015State v. Willis, 153 Wn.2d 366,370 , 103 P.3d 1213 (2005).

2015State v. Willis, 153 Wn.2d 366,370 , 103 P.3d 1213 (2005).

22014–2015
State v. Iniguez green
wash · 2009
2 sentences

2025Where a defendant alleges a violation of their right to a speedy trial as guaranteed by the Sixth Amendment, we apply the framework provided in Barker v. Wingo.4 State v. Iniguez, 167 Wn.2d 273, 283 , 217 P.3d 768 (2009).

2025Where a defendant alleges a violation of their right to a speedy trial as guaranteed by the Sixth Amendment, we apply the framework provided in Barker v. Wingo.4 State v. Iniguez, 167 Wn.2d 273, 283 , 217 P.3d 768 (2009).

12025–2025
Barker v. Wingo green
scotus · 1972
2 sentences

2024Constitutional speedy trial Where a defendant alleges a violation of his speedy trial right under the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution, Washington courts apply the framework provided in Barker v. Wingo, 407 U.S. 514 , 92 S. Ct. 2182 , 33 L.

2024Constitutional speedy trial Where a defendant alleges a violation of his speedy trial right under the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution, Washington courts apply the framework provided in Barker v. Wingo, 407 U.S. 514 , 92 S. Ct. 2182 , 33 L.

12024–2024
Boeing Co. v. Key green
washctapp · 2000
1 sentence

2014State v. Willis, 153 Wn.2d 366, 370 , 103 P.3d 1213 (2005). 6 No. 30806-5-111 State v. Garcia Morales "Whether to give a particular jury instruction," on the other hand, "is within the trial court's discretion." Boeing Co. v. Key, 101 Wn.

12014–2014
State v. Brown green
wash · 2002
2 sentences

2013Brown challenged an error in the accomplice liability instruction where he had been convicted for first degree robbery, first degree assault, 16 RP (Jan. 12, 2012) at 159 (emphasis added). 17 State v. Brown. 147 Wn.2d 330, 341 , 58 P.3d 889 (2002) (quoting Neder v. United States. 527 U.S. 1, 19 , 119 S. Ct. 1827 , 144 L Ed. 2d 35 (1999)). 18 King. 113 Wn.

2013Brown challenged an error in the accomplice liability instruction where he had been convicted for first degree robbery, first degree assault, 16 RP (Jan. 12, 2012) at 159 (emphasis added). 17 State v. Brown. 147 Wn.2d 330, 341 , 58 P.3d 889 (2002) (quoting Neder v. United States. 527 U.S. 1, 19 , 119 S. Ct. 1827 , 144 L Ed. 2d 35 (1999)). 18 King. 113 Wn.

12013–2013
Neder v. United States green
scotus · 1999
2 sentences

2013Brown challenged an error in the accomplice liability instruction where he had been convicted for first degree robbery, first degree assault, 16 RP (Jan. 12, 2012) at 159 (emphasis added). 17 State v. Brown. 147 Wn.2d 330, 341 , 58 P.3d 889 (2002) (quoting Neder v. United States. 527 U.S. 1, 19 , 119 S. Ct. 1827 , 144 L Ed. 2d 35 (1999)). 18 King. 113 Wn.

2013Brown challenged an error in the accomplice liability instruction where he had been convicted for first degree robbery, first degree assault, 16 RP (Jan. 12, 2012) at 159 (emphasis added). 17 State v. Brown. 147 Wn.2d 330, 341 , 58 P.3d 889 (2002) (quoting Neder v. United States. 527 U.S. 1, 19 , 119 S. Ct. 1827 , 144 L Ed. 2d 35 (1999)). 18 King. 113 Wn.

12013–2013
State v. Young green
wash · 1994
2 sentences

1997State v. Young, 123 Wn.2d 173, 178 , 867 P.2d 593 (1994).

1997State v. Young, 123 Wn.2d 173, 178 , 867 P.2d 593 (1994).

11997–1997

Statutes the citing opinions construe

WA § Wash. Rev. Code § 2.06.040 (4)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

CT 21 (1953–2025) PA 18 (1904–2021) MA 8 (1975–2014) WA 8 (1997–2025) NE 7 (1907–2004) IL 7 (1964–2026) TN 6 (2008–2019) TX 6 (2002–2020) NM 6 (1981–2019) NC 6 (1907–2025) NY 5 (1898–2024) MO 5 (1957–2017) AL 5 (1976–2008) WI 5 (1981–2020) ID 5 (2010–2014) KS 4 (2004–2022) RI 4 (1983–2019) NJ 4 (2020–2025) HI 4 (2003–2025) FL 4 (2001–2006) MN 4 (2004–2013) MS 3 (2006–2008) OK 3 (1974–1976) MI 3 (1980–2018) ME 3 (2013–2021) IA 3 (1995–2014) NH 2 (2002–2005) OH 2 (2014–2026) LA 2 (1985–1999)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check