Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Alabama opinions name it 2 courts 2000–2015 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Alabama courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Ex Parte Myersgreen2 sentences2015See Beck, 447 U.S. at 627 , 100 S.Ct. at 2384 (overturning death penalty where jury “was not permitted to consider a verdict of guilt of a lesser included non-capital offense, and when the evidence would have supported such a verdict’); cf. Hopper v. Evans, 456 U.S. 605, 610-14 , 102 S.Ct. 2049, 2052-54 , 72 L.Ed.2d 367 (1982) (upholding death sentence even though jury was instructed on only capital offense under Alabama’s preclusion statute, because the evidence did not support a lesser included - offense charge and defendant was thus not prejudiced by preclusion statute).... [A] lesser inclu 2013See Beck, 447 U.S. at 627 , 100 S.Ct. at 2384 (overturning death penalty where jury “was not permitted to consider a verdict of guilt of a lesser included non-capital offense, and when the evidence would have supported such a verdict’); cf. Hopper v. Evans, 456 U.S. 605, 610-14 , 102 S.Ct. 2049, 2052-54 , 72 L.Ed.2d 367 (1982) (upholding death sentence even though jury was instructed on only capital offense under Alabama’s preclusion statute, because the evidence did not support a lesser included offense charge and defendant was thus not prejudiced by preclusion statute)_ [A] lesser included n | 3 | 3 |
Bell v. Stategreen2 sentences2015See Beck, 447 U.S. at 627 , 100 S.Ct. at 2384 (overturning death penalty where jury “was not permitted to consider a verdict of guilt of a lesser included non-capital offense, and when the evidence would have supported such a verdict’); cf. Hopper v. Evans, 456 U.S. 605, 610-14 , 102 S.Ct. 2049, 2052-54 , 72 L.Ed.2d 367 (1982) (upholding death sentence even though jury was instructed on only capital offense under Alabama’s preclusion statute, because the evidence did not support a lesser included - offense charge and defendant was thus not prejudiced by preclusion statute).... [A] lesser inclu 2013See Beck, 447 U.S. at 627 , 100 S.Ct. at 2384 (overturning death penalty where jury “was not permitted to consider a verdict of guilt of a lesser included non-capital offense, and when the evidence would have supported such a verdict’); cf. Hopper v. Evans, 456 U.S. 605, 610-14 , 102 S.Ct. 2049, 2052-54 , 72 L.Ed.2d 367 (1982) (upholding death sentence even though jury was instructed on only capital offense under Alabama’s preclusion statute, because the evidence did not support a lesser included offense charge and defendant was thus not prejudiced by preclusion statute)_ [A] lesser included n | 3 | 3 |
Beck v. Alabamagreen2 sentences2015See Beck, 447 U.S. at 627 , 100 S.Ct. at 2384 (overturning death penalty where jury “was not permitted to consider a verdict of guilt of a lesser included non-capital offense, and when the evidence would have supported such a verdict’); cf. Hopper v. Evans, 456 U.S. 605, 610-14 , 102 S.Ct. 2049, 2052-54 , 72 L.Ed.2d 367 (1982) (upholding death sentence even though jury was instructed on only capital offense under Alabama’s preclusion statute, because the evidence did not support a lesser included - offense charge and defendant was thus not prejudiced by preclusion statute).... [A] lesser inclu 2015See Beck, 447 U.S. at 627 , 100 S.Ct. at 2384 (overturning death penalty where jury “was not permitted to consider a verdict of guilt of a lesser included non-capital offense, and when the evidence would have supported such a verdict’); cf. Hopper v. Evans, 456 U.S. 605, 610-14 , 102 S.Ct. 2049, 2052-54 , 72 L.Ed.2d 367 (1982) (upholding death sentence even though jury was instructed on only capital offense under Alabama’s preclusion statute, because the evidence did not support a lesser included - offense charge and defendant was thus not prejudiced by preclusion statute).... [A] lesser inclu | 3 | 3 |
Aman v. Gilleygreen1 sentence2010See Aman v. Gilley, 55 So.3d at 240 (Murdock, J., concurring in the result). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Alabama. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Hopper v. Evans
green
2 sentences2015See Beck, 447 U.S. at 627 , 100 S.Ct. at 2384 (overturning death penalty where jury “was not permitted to consider a verdict of guilt of a lesser included non-capital offense, and when the evidence would have supported such a verdict’); cf. Hopper v. Evans, 456 U.S. 605, 610-14 , 102 S.Ct. 2049, 2052-54 , 72 L.Ed.2d 367 (1982) (upholding death sentence even though jury was instructed on only capital offense under Alabama’s preclusion statute, because the evidence did not support a lesser included - offense charge and defendant was thus not prejudiced by preclusion statute).... [A] lesser inclu 2015See Beck, 447 U.S. at 627 , 100 S.Ct. at 2384 (overturning death penalty where jury “was not permitted to consider a verdict of guilt of a lesser included non-capital offense, and when the evidence would have supported such a verdict’); cf. Hopper v. Evans, 456 U.S. 605, 610-14 , 102 S.Ct. 2049, 2052-54 , 72 L.Ed.2d 367 (1982) (upholding death sentence even though jury was instructed on only capital offense under Alabama’s preclusion statute, because the evidence did not support a lesser included - offense charge and defendant was thus not prejudiced by preclusion statute).... [A] lesser inclu | 4 | 2000–2015 |
Maine v. Patten
green
1 sentence2000Alabama v. Wright , 457 U.S. 1114 (1982). | 1 | 2000–2000 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.