Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Alabama opinions name it 1 courts 1923–2006 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Alabama courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Almon v. Gibbsgreen2 sentences2006This absolute immunity for acts within the jurisdiction of the judicial officer is extended even where the officer acts in error, maliciously, or in excess of his authority.’ “Almon v. Gibbs, 545 So.2d 18, 20 (Ala.1989) (citing Stump v. Sparkman, [ 435 U.S. 349, 362 (1978) ], and Scott v. Dixon, 720 F.2d 1542 (11th Cir.1983)).” Robinson, 785 So.2d at 1133 . 2000This absolute immunity for acts within the jurisdiction of the judicial officer is extended even where the officer acts in error, maliciously, or in excess of his authority." Almon v. Gibbs , 545 So.2d 18 , 20 (Ala. 1989) (citing Stump v. Sparkman , supra, and Scott v. Dixon , 720 F.2d 1542 (11th Cir. 1983)). | 2 | 2 |
Stump v. Sparkmangreen2 sentences2006This absolute immunity for acts within the jurisdiction of the judicial officer is extended even where the officer acts in error, maliciously, or in excess of his authority.’ “Almon v. Gibbs, 545 So.2d 18, 20 (Ala.1989) (citing Stump v. Sparkman, [ 435 U.S. 349, 362 (1978) ], and Scott v. Dixon, 720 F.2d 1542 (11th Cir.1983)).” Robinson, 785 So.2d at 1133 . 2000This absolute immunity for acts within the jurisdiction of the judicial officer is extended even where the officer acts in error, maliciously, or in excess of his authority." Almon v. Gibbs , 545 So.2d 18 , 20 (Ala. 1989) (citing Stump v. Sparkman , supra, and Scott v. Dixon , 720 F.2d 1542 (11th Cir. 1983)). | 1 | 2 |
City of Bayou La Batre v. Robinsongreen2 sentences2005See Bayou La Batre, 785 So.2d at 1133 ("This Court has extended the principle of judicial immunity to the discretionary judicial acts of magistrates and clerks of court."). 8 It is unclear how Ware could have been negligent in simply instructing Baker to "clean up" the court files. 2005See Bayou La Batre, 785 So.2d at 1133 ("This Court has extended the principle of judicial immunity to the discretionary judicial acts of magistrates and clerks of court."). [8] It is unclear how Ware could have been negligent in simply instructing Baker to "clean up" the court files. | 1 | 2 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Alabama. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Lindsey M. Scott v. Larry Dixon
green
2 sentences2006This absolute immunity for acts within the jurisdiction of the judicial officer is extended even where the officer acts in error, maliciously, or in excess of his authority.’ “Almon v. Gibbs, 545 So.2d 18, 20 (Ala.1989) (citing Stump v. Sparkman, [ 435 U.S. 349, 362 (1978) ], and Scott v. Dixon, 720 F.2d 1542 (11th Cir.1983)).” Robinson, 785 So.2d at 1133 . 2000This absolute immunity for acts within the jurisdiction of the judicial officer is extended even where the officer acts in error, maliciously, or in excess of his authority." Almon v. Gibbs , 545 So.2d 18 , 20 (Ala. 1989) (citing Stump v. Sparkman , supra, and Scott v. Dixon , 720 F.2d 1542 (11th Cir. 1983)). | 2 | 2000–2006 |
Ex Parte Coastal Training Institute
green
2 sentences2006Quoting Coastal Training Institute, the main opinion characterizes as "self-incrimination" the possibility that Bryan will be "`compelled to refuse to answer questions. . . .'" 583 So.2d at 981 . 2006Quoting Coastal Training Institute , the main opinion characterizes as "self-incrimination" the possibility that Bryan will be "`compelled to refuse to answer questions. . . .'" 583 So.2d at 981 . | 1 | 2006–2006 |
Brown v. Alabama Chemical Co.
green
2 sentences1923Thereafter, in Brown v. Alabama Chemical Co., 207 Ala. 215 , 92 South. 260 , the Thompson and Woolf Cases, supra, were reviewed, the Massachusetts case (Nute v. Hamilton Ins. 1923Thereafter, in Brown v. Alabama Chemical Co., 207 Ala. 215 , 92 South. 260 , the Thompson and Woolf Cases, supra, were reviewed, the Massachusetts case (Nute v. Hamilton Ins. | 1 | 1923–1923 |
Woolf v. McGaugh
green
2 sentences1923That is to say, from the holding that venue is a personal privilege which may be waived by a defendant’s failure to complain against a suit filed against him in the county in which neither he, nor one of the defendants, resides, the court has extended the rule to the effect that the debtor might in advance stipulate in the contract the county in which he would be suable on or under that contract, and as a part of the valuable “consideration supporting the contract.” In Thompson v. Union Springs Guano Co., supra, the plaintiff being a corporation, it is declared, on authority of Woolf v. McGaug 1923That is to say, from the holding that venue is a personal privilege which may be waived by a defendant’s failure to complain against a suit filed against him in the county in which neither he, nor one of the defendants, resides, the court has extended the rule to the effect that the debtor might in advance stipulate in the contract the county in which he would be suable on or under that contract, and as a part of the valuable “consideration supporting the contract.” In Thompson v. Union Springs Guano Co., supra, the plaintiff being a corporation, it is declared, on authority of Woolf v. McGaug | 1 | 1923–1923 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.