Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Alabama opinions name it 2 courts 1959–2002 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Alabama courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Alabama. | ||
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Alabama. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Cook & Laurie Contracting Co. v. Bell
green
2 sentences1978The motion must specifically challenge or question the amount of the verdict as being excessive. § 811, Title 7, Code of 1940; Cook Laurie Contracting Co. v. Bell , 177 Ala. 618 , 59 S. 273; Central of Georgia R. 1959The motion must specifically challenge or question the amount of the verdict as being excessive. § 811, Title 7, Code of 1940; Cook & Laurie Contracting Co. v. Bell, 177 Ala. 618 , 59 So. 274 ; Central of Georgia R. | 3 | 1959–1986 |
Peete v. Blackwell
green
2 sentences2002The motion must specifically challenge or question the amount of the verdict as being excessive.' (Emphasis added.)) See also § 12-22-71, Ala.Code 1975, Peete v. Blackwell, 504 So.2d 222 (Ala. 1986), and Feazell v. Campbell, 358 So.2d 1017 (Ala.1978)." 776 So.2d at 794 . 2000The motion must specifically challenge or question the amount of the verdict as being excessive." (Emphasis added.)) See also § 12-22-71, Ala.Code 1975, Peete v. Blackwell, 504 So.2d 222 (Ala.1986), and Feazell v. Campbell, 358 So.2d 1017 (Ala. 1978). | 2 | 2000–2002 |
Feazell v. Campbell
green
2 sentences2002The motion must specifically challenge or question the amount of the verdict as being excessive.' (Emphasis added.)) See also § 12-22-71, Ala.Code 1975, Peete v. Blackwell, 504 So.2d 222 (Ala. 1986), and Feazell v. Campbell, 358 So.2d 1017 (Ala.1978)." 776 So.2d at 794 . 2000The motion must specifically challenge or question the amount of the verdict as being excessive." (Emphasis added.)) See also § 12-22-71, Ala.Code 1975, Peete v. Blackwell, 504 So.2d 222 (Ala.1986), and Feazell v. Campbell, 358 So.2d 1017 (Ala. 1978). | 2 | 2000–2002 |
Central of Ga. Ry. Co. v. Chicago Varnish Co.
neutral
2 sentences1978Co. v. Chicago Varnish Co. , 169 Ala. 287 , 53 So. 832 ; Central of Georgia R. 1978Co. v. Chicago Varnish Co. , 169 Ala. 287 , 53 So. 832 ; Central of Georgia R. | 2 | 1959–1978 |
ConAgra, Inc. v. Turner
green
1 sentence2002The motion must specifically challenge or question the amount of the verdict as being excessive.' (Emphasis added.)) See also § 12-22-71, Ala.Code 1975, Peete v. Blackwell, 504 So.2d 222 (Ala. 1986), and Feazell v. Campbell, 358 So.2d 1017 (Ala.1978)." 776 So.2d at 794 . | 1 | 2002–2002 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.